Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GlassJaw" data-source="post: 2298146" data-attributes="member: 22103">Ahh, gotcha.  Again, very cool idea although I think there would be some weird math on occasion.Using the example you used above, the fighter would still have a lot more VP's left than his newly calculated "max".  Technically, an attack that deals WP won't deal VP.  So that fighter would still have 72 VP.  The new "max" based on his adjusted Con won't really affect him at all.  It will come into play if he takes further VP damage.  He'll have to heal his WP damage first before any of his VP will come back.It becomes slightly more viable if you rule that an attack that deals WP damage also reduces VP (which I like).  Even with that you will still have circumstances where the adjusted VP max is lower than the current number of VP.  Maybe that's ok though.I do agree with you though that if you can't recover VP if you have WP damage, as soon as a player takes WP damage, they are going to be in serious trouble.  And they won't be recovering anytime soon.</blockquote>