Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is A Vampiric Dragonwere Giant A Compelling Monster?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="arscott" data-source="post: 5752413" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>There are two kinds of monsters that work well in D&D: The fantasy monster, and the science-fiction monster.</p><p></p><p>The fantasy monster works because it is familiar. It reminds us of the stories we read when we were children, of folktales passed down from ancient times. A red dragon is a fantasy monster. A vampire is a fantasy monster. An elf is a fantasy monster. Every fact about these monsters should seem like it's passed on from ancient tales. When the Monster Manual says a Rakshasa can be slain only by an arrow that has been blessed by a Brahmin, it seems true--even if it was made up for the Kolchak episode.</p><p></p><p>The sci-fi monster, though, works because it is strange. It is a creature of horror or wonder that we have never before seen. We fear a dragon because we know exactly what it can do. But we fear a Mind flayer because it is an unkown. These creatures have strange visages, strange habits, and strength and weaknesses that we cannot expect.</p><p></p><p>Your monster sits in an awkward place between the two. It doesn't work as a fantasy monster, because it is too strange. We perhaps recognize the elements of dragon and vampire and giant, but we do not expect dragons and vampires and giants to be united into one creature. We do not expect giants to transform with the sun. We do not expect dragons to have probosces.</p><p></p><p>But it also doesn't work as a sci-fi monster, because it is too recognizable. We still see those recognizable elements. The sci-fi creature is the child of a warped and powerful imagination, and when we see those familiar elements, it seems like a failure of imagination.</p><p></p><p>So my advice is to pick one side or the others. What you have is a good story (benevolent entities are secretly horrible monsters) that will work with either a fantasy monster or a sci-fi monster. If you choose fantasy, then pick an existing monster (such as a werewolf or a pureblood yuan ti) and go with that. If you choose sci-fi, then take your existing monster and tweak the design so we no longer see the dragon or the vampire or the giant quite so clearly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="arscott, post: 5752413, member: 17969"] There are two kinds of monsters that work well in D&D: The fantasy monster, and the science-fiction monster. The fantasy monster works because it is familiar. It reminds us of the stories we read when we were children, of folktales passed down from ancient times. A red dragon is a fantasy monster. A vampire is a fantasy monster. An elf is a fantasy monster. Every fact about these monsters should seem like it's passed on from ancient tales. When the Monster Manual says a Rakshasa can be slain only by an arrow that has been blessed by a Brahmin, it seems true--even if it was made up for the Kolchak episode. The sci-fi monster, though, works because it is strange. It is a creature of horror or wonder that we have never before seen. We fear a dragon because we know exactly what it can do. But we fear a Mind flayer because it is an unkown. These creatures have strange visages, strange habits, and strength and weaknesses that we cannot expect. Your monster sits in an awkward place between the two. It doesn't work as a fantasy monster, because it is too strange. We perhaps recognize the elements of dragon and vampire and giant, but we do not expect dragons and vampires and giants to be united into one creature. We do not expect giants to transform with the sun. We do not expect dragons to have probosces. But it also doesn't work as a sci-fi monster, because it is too recognizable. We still see those recognizable elements. The sci-fi creature is the child of a warped and powerful imagination, and when we see those familiar elements, it seems like a failure of imagination. So my advice is to pick one side or the others. What you have is a good story (benevolent entities are secretly horrible monsters) that will work with either a fantasy monster or a sci-fi monster. If you choose fantasy, then pick an existing monster (such as a werewolf or a pureblood yuan ti) and go with that. If you choose sci-fi, then take your existing monster and tweak the design so we no longer see the dragon or the vampire or the giant quite so clearly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is A Vampiric Dragonwere Giant A Compelling Monster?
Top