Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is an 18/19/20 an absolute must?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mneme" data-source="post: 5023454" data-attributes="member: 59248"><p>It's really simple -- if you're not getting enough out of high secondary stats to justify lowering your primary stat, you're better off bumping the primary (this is frequently the case). If you're getting -depressingly- little out of your secondary stats, you're usually better with the primary at 19 or 20.</p><p></p><p>In particular, characters who wear light armor and use dex/int as primary should frequently have a 20 int/dex. You're getting damage, AC, and to-hit out of your primary, so you'd better be getting a lot if you start with lower (that said, my genasi wizard went 17 str/19 Int, so I could start with a bump in wisdom and a respectable Str).</p><p></p><p>Characters that can get to-hit/damage from a secondary stat and otherwise get big bonuses from same should go for more balanced stats. Dwarven fighters are classic here -- and they're classic for a reason -- with the right feats, a dwarven fighter with 16/16/16 will hit more and do more damage on combat challenge and opportunity attacks (though not on normal attacks) than a fighter with a 20 in her main stat, due to a combination of +wis to hit and +2+con to damage, -and- get all the good dwarven stuff and very good defenses. And 18/18 dwarves can work well as well.</p><p></p><p>Taclords are another common upside down class, with a fair number of people doing a 18 or even a 20 Int and a lower strength. I'm not entirely down with this -- I think 18/18 is probably right (for, say, a Genasi taclord), but given the short length of most D&D fights given optimiszed characters, it's hard to justify lowering your ability to hit and damage with most of your encounters and dailies just to power up your at-wills (and -occasional- encounters). If and when you can build a taclord who only makes Str-based attacks on dailies, it might be worth finding a way to boost 2-3 attacks per day and going 16/20, though, saving the big boosts for daily attacks off Str, though.</p><p></p><p>So in sum, figure out what the minimum you need in secondary stats to be effective with those stats, then dump the rest into primary unless you've got a -very- good reason not to. With different class/race combinations having different ideas of what you need in secondary for being "effective".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mneme, post: 5023454, member: 59248"] It's really simple -- if you're not getting enough out of high secondary stats to justify lowering your primary stat, you're better off bumping the primary (this is frequently the case). If you're getting -depressingly- little out of your secondary stats, you're usually better with the primary at 19 or 20. In particular, characters who wear light armor and use dex/int as primary should frequently have a 20 int/dex. You're getting damage, AC, and to-hit out of your primary, so you'd better be getting a lot if you start with lower (that said, my genasi wizard went 17 str/19 Int, so I could start with a bump in wisdom and a respectable Str). Characters that can get to-hit/damage from a secondary stat and otherwise get big bonuses from same should go for more balanced stats. Dwarven fighters are classic here -- and they're classic for a reason -- with the right feats, a dwarven fighter with 16/16/16 will hit more and do more damage on combat challenge and opportunity attacks (though not on normal attacks) than a fighter with a 20 in her main stat, due to a combination of +wis to hit and +2+con to damage, -and- get all the good dwarven stuff and very good defenses. And 18/18 dwarves can work well as well. Taclords are another common upside down class, with a fair number of people doing a 18 or even a 20 Int and a lower strength. I'm not entirely down with this -- I think 18/18 is probably right (for, say, a Genasi taclord), but given the short length of most D&D fights given optimiszed characters, it's hard to justify lowering your ability to hit and damage with most of your encounters and dailies just to power up your at-wills (and -occasional- encounters). If and when you can build a taclord who only makes Str-based attacks on dailies, it might be worth finding a way to boost 2-3 attacks per day and going 16/20, though, saving the big boosts for daily attacks off Str, though. So in sum, figure out what the minimum you need in secondary stats to be effective with those stats, then dump the rest into primary unless you've got a -very- good reason not to. With different class/race combinations having different ideas of what you need in secondary for being "effective". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is an 18/19/20 an absolute must?
Top