Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is any one alignment intellectually superior?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Viktyr Gehrig" data-source="post: 2156426" data-attributes="member: 9249"><p>No alignment can claim intellectual superiority.</p><p></p><p>I have seen inspiring and thought-provoking philosophical arguments in favor of philosophies that could correspond to roughly every D&D alignment. I have also seen people dogmatically and incoherently assert the value of ideologies that would correspond roughly to the D&D alignments, who have damaged the esteem of their worldview in my eyes.</p><p></p><p>Most people will argue that Good is morally superior to Neutral and Evil-- this is almost seen as a truism. I tend to disagree with this, especially with the version of Good I so often see portrayed in alignment threads around here. That kind of willful naivete and rejection of pragmatic means, while providing a feel-good glow of moral satisfaction, also fails to adequately protect against either self-serving evil or mindless destructive evil.</p><p></p><p>If a philosophy requires every last person on Earth to adopt it in order to succeed, it is flawed-- and most peoples' definition of Good seems to fall under that unfortunate condition.</p><p></p><p>Lawful Neutral is the alignment most conducive to maintaining the stability of society and providing the greatest good for all. It rejects the selfishness of Chaos and Evil, and is willing to be appropriately ruthless and practical in protecting society from either influence; it also shows the judgement and restraint necessary to avoid the cruelty and destructive tendencies of Evil-- including the more subtle and insidious Lawful Evil.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Neutrality is not necessarily the refusal to decide or the inability to adhere to either Good or Evil; it can also be the conscious and willful decision to maintain a middle path, avoiding the follies of either. Neutrality can also represent a worldview that regards neither Good nor Evil as valid concerns-- such as placing another value, perhaps either stability or freedom, ahead of either compassion or cruelty.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Viktyr Gehrig, post: 2156426, member: 9249"] No alignment can claim intellectual superiority. I have seen inspiring and thought-provoking philosophical arguments in favor of philosophies that could correspond to roughly every D&D alignment. I have also seen people dogmatically and incoherently assert the value of ideologies that would correspond roughly to the D&D alignments, who have damaged the esteem of their worldview in my eyes. Most people will argue that Good is morally superior to Neutral and Evil-- this is almost seen as a truism. I tend to disagree with this, especially with the version of Good I so often see portrayed in alignment threads around here. That kind of willful naivete and rejection of pragmatic means, while providing a feel-good glow of moral satisfaction, also fails to adequately protect against either self-serving evil or mindless destructive evil. If a philosophy requires every last person on Earth to adopt it in order to succeed, it is flawed-- and most peoples' definition of Good seems to fall under that unfortunate condition. Lawful Neutral is the alignment most conducive to maintaining the stability of society and providing the greatest good for all. It rejects the selfishness of Chaos and Evil, and is willing to be appropriately ruthless and practical in protecting society from either influence; it also shows the judgement and restraint necessary to avoid the cruelty and destructive tendencies of Evil-- including the more subtle and insidious Lawful Evil. Neutrality is not necessarily the refusal to decide or the inability to adhere to either Good or Evil; it can also be the conscious and willful decision to maintain a middle path, avoiding the follies of either. Neutrality can also represent a worldview that regards neither Good nor Evil as valid concerns-- such as placing another value, perhaps either stability or freedom, ahead of either compassion or cruelty. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is any one alignment intellectually superior?
Top