Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is any one alignment intellectually superior?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 2157326" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>I think you are making an argument by false analogy. Systems of ethical belief are not analogous to sports teams. Also 'best' in the sense you use in the above sentence is not the same as 'correct', as can be simply seen by replacing the words. You would not ask a sports fan who is the correct Football or Baseball team. Just because you can use 'best' or 'correct' interchangably when talking about ethics, doesn't mean the words are always synonyms.</p><p></p><p>The reason that the analogy is false is that in general people do not base thier ideas of who they believe themselves to be on which football or baseball team is best. A person's belief in which sports team is best usually is not a particularly important guiding principal in thier lives. Most people simply do not give this a particularly high priority when determining how to live thier lives. Very few people believe that the fact that one sport's team is better than another has any impact on how they 'ought' to live thier lives. The same is not true of people's beliefs about morals and ethics.</p><p></p><p>To the extent that your analogy actually would have any merit, it would only be found in cases where a person's belief about the superiority of a sports team was in fact part of what they saw themselves to be. The more profound a person's belief in the superiority of a sports team impacted thier daily life, the better we would expect allegiance to sport's teams to resemble allegiance to a moral code (or lack thereof). And in fact, when this is the case, you'll find that the analogy supports my position. For sports fans for which allegiance to particular team defines to themselves who they are, you'll find that thier answer about what team is best is not objective but obviously betrays thier adherence to the ideas that they believe that team stands for. The more this is the case, the more the answer to which sports team is best says more about the person than it does about sports teams. For example, you would NOT expect to a true Boston Red Sox fan to ever admit to himself (or anyone else) that the New York Yankees were a better team, and when it appeared to you objectively that this was the case, then you had grounds for classifying that person as a 'Boston Red Sox'. Similarly for Arsenal vs. Manchester United, or England vs. Ireland, or Auburn vs. Alabama, or the Yankees vs. the Brooklyn dodgers or any other rivalry where the allegiance to a team helps define a person's character.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 2157326, member: 4937"] I think you are making an argument by false analogy. Systems of ethical belief are not analogous to sports teams. Also 'best' in the sense you use in the above sentence is not the same as 'correct', as can be simply seen by replacing the words. You would not ask a sports fan who is the correct Football or Baseball team. Just because you can use 'best' or 'correct' interchangably when talking about ethics, doesn't mean the words are always synonyms. The reason that the analogy is false is that in general people do not base thier ideas of who they believe themselves to be on which football or baseball team is best. A person's belief in which sports team is best usually is not a particularly important guiding principal in thier lives. Most people simply do not give this a particularly high priority when determining how to live thier lives. Very few people believe that the fact that one sport's team is better than another has any impact on how they 'ought' to live thier lives. The same is not true of people's beliefs about morals and ethics. To the extent that your analogy actually would have any merit, it would only be found in cases where a person's belief about the superiority of a sports team was in fact part of what they saw themselves to be. The more profound a person's belief in the superiority of a sports team impacted thier daily life, the better we would expect allegiance to sport's teams to resemble allegiance to a moral code (or lack thereof). And in fact, when this is the case, you'll find that the analogy supports my position. For sports fans for which allegiance to particular team defines to themselves who they are, you'll find that thier answer about what team is best is not objective but obviously betrays thier adherence to the ideas that they believe that team stands for. The more this is the case, the more the answer to which sports team is best says more about the person than it does about sports teams. For example, you would NOT expect to a true Boston Red Sox fan to ever admit to himself (or anyone else) that the New York Yankees were a better team, and when it appeared to you objectively that this was the case, then you had grounds for classifying that person as a 'Boston Red Sox'. Similarly for Arsenal vs. Manchester United, or England vs. Ireland, or Auburn vs. Alabama, or the Yankees vs. the Brooklyn dodgers or any other rivalry where the allegiance to a team helps define a person's character. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is any one alignment intellectually superior?
Top