Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is any one alignment intellectually superior?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Morrow" data-source="post: 2157342" data-attributes="member: 27012"><p>Actually, no it isn't for most people. For most people, freedom is a means to an end. In fact, people happily surrender their freedom for a whole host of ends (much to the annoyance of people who do consider freedom an end) and would you really advocate freedom as an end if it produced nothing but misery and ruin? </p><p></p><p>To be fair, though, the Lawful or Chaotic character likely does consider either order or freedom to be an end, and is likely baffled by those who simply treat them as means toward an end. This goes back to an earlier exchange about treating Law and Chaos differently than Good and Evil. I'm more concerned with the latter than the former. But you have a point with respect to the former.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In the case of Evil, those means are also an end. Evil doesn't hurt, kill, or oppress for some utilitarian purpose or ulterior motive. It hurts, kills, and oppresses because it enjoys causing pain. The enjoyment of the torture is the reason the torture is happening. I would argue (and have argued) that if a character is torturing an NPC toward a utilitarian end (or helping them toward a utilitiaran end), those acts are not necessarily Good nor Evil. What makes a character Good or Evil is that their behavior has no other motivation.</p><p></p><p>I suppose you can make the same argument about Law and Chaos. The extreme points at LN and CN are where the character is treating either order or freedom as an end, regardless of any other impact those ideals have. Fair enough.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And how does this relate back to the question of which alignment has an intellectual edge?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>With respect to the things that the D&D alignment concerns itself, I think it does OK. Just don't expect it to model distinctions in the moral spectrum of the real world that it doesn't address and don't be suprised if it creates some strange bedfellows. But regardless, I think you'll also find geniuses and morons across the D&D alignment spectrum, if you want to think of that as a distinct spectrum.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm working with the assumption of the original question.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Morrow, post: 2157342, member: 27012"] Actually, no it isn't for most people. For most people, freedom is a means to an end. In fact, people happily surrender their freedom for a whole host of ends (much to the annoyance of people who do consider freedom an end) and would you really advocate freedom as an end if it produced nothing but misery and ruin? To be fair, though, the Lawful or Chaotic character likely does consider either order or freedom to be an end, and is likely baffled by those who simply treat them as means toward an end. This goes back to an earlier exchange about treating Law and Chaos differently than Good and Evil. I'm more concerned with the latter than the former. But you have a point with respect to the former. In the case of Evil, those means are also an end. Evil doesn't hurt, kill, or oppress for some utilitarian purpose or ulterior motive. It hurts, kills, and oppresses because it enjoys causing pain. The enjoyment of the torture is the reason the torture is happening. I would argue (and have argued) that if a character is torturing an NPC toward a utilitarian end (or helping them toward a utilitiaran end), those acts are not necessarily Good nor Evil. What makes a character Good or Evil is that their behavior has no other motivation. I suppose you can make the same argument about Law and Chaos. The extreme points at LN and CN are where the character is treating either order or freedom as an end, regardless of any other impact those ideals have. Fair enough. And how does this relate back to the question of which alignment has an intellectual edge? With respect to the things that the D&D alignment concerns itself, I think it does OK. Just don't expect it to model distinctions in the moral spectrum of the real world that it doesn't address and don't be suprised if it creates some strange bedfellows. But regardless, I think you'll also find geniuses and morons across the D&D alignment spectrum, if you want to think of that as a distinct spectrum. I'm working with the assumption of the original question. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is any one alignment intellectually superior?
Top