Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Anyone Unhappy About Non-LG Paladins?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sword of Spirit" data-source="post: 6315118" data-attributes="member: 6677017"><p>I've always thought that paladins would be better if NG was allowed along with LG. A NG character could <em>easily</em> subscribe to a LG code. He's just be a bit more flexible in interpretation, and wouldn't struggle so much about what to do when the lawful authorities were clearly in the wrong.</p><p></p><p>I'm probably going to run the Oath of Devotion (traditional paladin) similar to that. Their oath is generally LG, but there are plenty of NG paladins who follow it, and even a small number of LN. While it might appear to be a monolithic philosophy that all paladins (again, I'm only referring to the specific LG-themed Devotion subclass) are on-board with to an outsider, within the ranks of experienced paladins disagreements and variant interpretations start becoming evident.</p><p></p><p>As an imperfect analogy, take the Jedi order. They are an order of warriors with a strong traditional code (not the same as paladin's code, but the same level of importance to them). At first they come across as monolithic and absolutely devoted to their code, hook, line, and sinker. But I've been watching the Clone Wars lately, and it's really interesting seeing more of the reality. They <em>aren't</em> all in agreement about it! Sure, it's written down pretty strictly, and there is only a bit of wiggle room, but there are definitely disagreements, and pretty much <em>all</em> of the Jedi struggle with it. That whole thing about keeping your passions in check? Even Yoda gets pissed on occasion! It's something they all struggle with. Then there are the much less popular aspects of the order. I was (pleasantly) shocked to learn that Obi-wan used to have a love interest and would have left the order to be with her if she had asked. And of course, we've got Anakin with his secret marriage to Padme. Despite flagrantly disregarding that part of the code, and occasionally bending things dark side when it was really important to him, and despite not appearing to care much at all about the "don't be attached and don't have passions" major component of Jedi philosophy, he still was a sincerely devoted member of the order, and a good guy (I'd say NG) right up until his fall. Even on the council, there were probably a couple of different alignments or philosophies.</p><p></p><p>So I think that's how I'm going to spin a paladin Oath. It has a traditional interpretation (LG for Devotion, others for other codes), and the majority of the followers attempt to follow it in that way, regardless of alignment. But there are various interpretations, and some paladins just outright disagree with it...but they keep getting their powers nevertheless. (If they completely "went darkside" I'd probably have them swap out subclasses to one more fitting, but I wouldn't penalize them statistically).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sword of Spirit, post: 6315118, member: 6677017"] I've always thought that paladins would be better if NG was allowed along with LG. A NG character could [I]easily[/I] subscribe to a LG code. He's just be a bit more flexible in interpretation, and wouldn't struggle so much about what to do when the lawful authorities were clearly in the wrong. I'm probably going to run the Oath of Devotion (traditional paladin) similar to that. Their oath is generally LG, but there are plenty of NG paladins who follow it, and even a small number of LN. While it might appear to be a monolithic philosophy that all paladins (again, I'm only referring to the specific LG-themed Devotion subclass) are on-board with to an outsider, within the ranks of experienced paladins disagreements and variant interpretations start becoming evident. As an imperfect analogy, take the Jedi order. They are an order of warriors with a strong traditional code (not the same as paladin's code, but the same level of importance to them). At first they come across as monolithic and absolutely devoted to their code, hook, line, and sinker. But I've been watching the Clone Wars lately, and it's really interesting seeing more of the reality. They [I]aren't[/I] all in agreement about it! Sure, it's written down pretty strictly, and there is only a bit of wiggle room, but there are definitely disagreements, and pretty much [I]all[/I] of the Jedi struggle with it. That whole thing about keeping your passions in check? Even Yoda gets pissed on occasion! It's something they all struggle with. Then there are the much less popular aspects of the order. I was (pleasantly) shocked to learn that Obi-wan used to have a love interest and would have left the order to be with her if she had asked. And of course, we've got Anakin with his secret marriage to Padme. Despite flagrantly disregarding that part of the code, and occasionally bending things dark side when it was really important to him, and despite not appearing to care much at all about the "don't be attached and don't have passions" major component of Jedi philosophy, he still was a sincerely devoted member of the order, and a good guy (I'd say NG) right up until his fall. Even on the council, there were probably a couple of different alignments or philosophies. So I think that's how I'm going to spin a paladin Oath. It has a traditional interpretation (LG for Devotion, others for other codes), and the majority of the followers attempt to follow it in that way, regardless of alignment. But there are various interpretations, and some paladins just outright disagree with it...but they keep getting their powers nevertheless. (If they completely "went darkside" I'd probably have them swap out subclasses to one more fitting, but I wouldn't penalize them statistically). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Anyone Unhappy About Non-LG Paladins?
Top