Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Anyone Unhappy About Non-LG Paladins?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elf Witch" data-source="post: 6316172" data-attributes="member: 9037"><p>I most certainly hold clerics to the same standards as paladins I use the Kingdoms of Kalamar rule that clerics have to be the same alignment as their deity. And clerics can lose powers or worse have their powers supplied by an evil deity this putting the taint of evil on them. </p><p></p><p>A player should certainly be allowed to play his character anyway he wants to. And as DM I can play how the NPCs react to that character in the way I think makes sense. </p><p></p><p>I don't need a hard fast rule to give consequences to players. I am very creative at coming up with both good and bad consequences. </p><p></p><p>I have had the displeasure of playing with players who want all the goodies of a cleric of paladin and then act totally immoral and my experience is that with those type of players you can't reign them in they will throw the biggest tantrum if you try. My solution is to simply not play with them because I am not interested in playing a role playing light style of DnD. </p><p></p><p>How I handle a player who imo as DM is coming close to facing some kind of consequence is to talk to them out of game about it. If they are willing to continue on the path of falling then they know there will be some kind of role playing consequence. </p><p></p><p>I rarely have issues with the actual player playing paladins the issues come from other players who feel it is acceptable to tell a paladin how to play. One of my hard fast rules to prevent this is that no one is allowed to question how another player is playing their character at the table. They are to come to me about it privately. Now that does not mean that they can't role play their PCs having an issue with another PC about that PCs actions. </p><p></p><p>I also never talk about an issue with it in front of everyone that leads to arguments and often makes the player in question fell ganged up on. </p><p></p><p>And lastly I am the DM I have the final say if you don't like my decision then you are free to leave the game or as my roommate told a player who was arguing with her about the cleric actions being evil " I am playing Herineous in this campaign I don't have a problem with my follower actions when you DM feel free to play Herineous anyway you want".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elf Witch, post: 6316172, member: 9037"] I most certainly hold clerics to the same standards as paladins I use the Kingdoms of Kalamar rule that clerics have to be the same alignment as their deity. And clerics can lose powers or worse have their powers supplied by an evil deity this putting the taint of evil on them. A player should certainly be allowed to play his character anyway he wants to. And as DM I can play how the NPCs react to that character in the way I think makes sense. I don't need a hard fast rule to give consequences to players. I am very creative at coming up with both good and bad consequences. I have had the displeasure of playing with players who want all the goodies of a cleric of paladin and then act totally immoral and my experience is that with those type of players you can't reign them in they will throw the biggest tantrum if you try. My solution is to simply not play with them because I am not interested in playing a role playing light style of DnD. How I handle a player who imo as DM is coming close to facing some kind of consequence is to talk to them out of game about it. If they are willing to continue on the path of falling then they know there will be some kind of role playing consequence. I rarely have issues with the actual player playing paladins the issues come from other players who feel it is acceptable to tell a paladin how to play. One of my hard fast rules to prevent this is that no one is allowed to question how another player is playing their character at the table. They are to come to me about it privately. Now that does not mean that they can't role play their PCs having an issue with another PC about that PCs actions. I also never talk about an issue with it in front of everyone that leads to arguments and often makes the player in question fell ganged up on. And lastly I am the DM I have the final say if you don't like my decision then you are free to leave the game or as my roommate told a player who was arguing with her about the cleric actions being evil " I am playing Herineous in this campaign I don't have a problem with my follower actions when you DM feel free to play Herineous anyway you want". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Anyone Unhappy About Non-LG Paladins?
Top