Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Greg K" data-source="post: 6318592" data-attributes="member: 5038">Hussar, you are not wrong for having your opinion or a bad player. However, given your posts about world building, your posts in the DM Entitlement thread and how you would try to pull players from the group, and other threads, you would just be a bad player at our table. Your view of the game and how it should be approached is far different than ours and other groups that I know and have known. Based on the thread about trying to players, because you don't like a DM banning an option you want, because they don't like it, I don't see you, maturely, handling a situation you seriously dislike or letting it go. At the time of the incident, the group was 3/4 DM's (before two moved cross-country and one player lost his driver's license) and a single player voicing serious objections to how a DM handled something would be met with accepting the DM's decision or don't play.  Granted, how you would react if the DM banned something you wanted, because they didn't like it might be coloring my perception of how you would react if you seriously disliked a decision regarding the Paladin situation.I agree. It is just play style preferences. However, when I run, my style takes precedence. If I were to run Dungeon World, I would build the setting first and then tailored playbooks for certain classes (e.g., clerics tailored to different deities). Then again, I like to have the setting pre-determined (and one of the booklets on the Dungeon World site states that creating the setting can work) and characters fit within the setting's limitations. Having the setting determined ahead of time, makes it easier for me to see what happens in play. Similarly, if I run Fate Core, I am  also building the setting ahead of time and someone introducing elements that I feel do not fit would be overridden.</blockquote>

Verification