Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Uchawi" data-source="post: 6318639" data-attributes="member: 6775000">My biggest problem with alignment based classes is it immediately places the player and DM at odds when playing the class. The interaction becomes a struggle on when a class looses access to their ability when not following an alignment. If they did that for all the classes, you either have a very tolerant table, or someone it going to leave when the DM says you lost the ability for reasons x, y and z. When it is not clear even if reasons a, b, and c will end up in losing the class ability. If they did emulate a system that used some type of scale to track alignment, then it should track it every game session. So it may take a series of 5 to 10 game sessions, with multiple warnings that the player may lose something, but during those 5 to 10 sessions they have a chance to recover. But that is a lot of book keeping, where it is just easier to let the player choose how to role-play their character.So with the stated I am happy with a paladin being based on any alignment.</blockquote>