Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Chaotic Neutral the Good Man's Evil?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 6562387" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Indeed.</p><p></p><p>The proper response to IC jerk moves is to respond IC to them. The sorcerer is an outlier in the group. His relationship to the rest of the group is basically that of a mercenary. He doesn't agree with their methods or their goals, and his own beliefs are distasteful to them. He's in this for his own benefit. He's made it abundantly clear just how limited his sense of loyalty, attachment, and concern for the other PC's is. It would be incredibly surprising if the party didn't reevaluate whether to boot the sorcerer off the island. </p><p></p><p>I personally would consider that a good scene, with the CN sorcerer being forced to evaluate what value he has in continuing with the group (presumably larger than he's been willing to admit). The thing is, even from a CN perspective, the party has a valid complaint. If the relationship isn't mutually beneficial, why should it continue? Aren't they free to go their own way? It's not like the party is angry at him for not throwing himself in front of the charging dire rhino. The party might not have a right to ask him to sacrifice himself for their interests, but they have a reasonable expectation that he won't be actively working against their interests.</p><p></p><p>And if the player really feels the character is like, "Screw you. My interests and needs are more important yours.", then maybe it's time to mark down CE... and possibly retire the character and start a new one that fits in more.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 6562387, member: 4937"] Indeed. The proper response to IC jerk moves is to respond IC to them. The sorcerer is an outlier in the group. His relationship to the rest of the group is basically that of a mercenary. He doesn't agree with their methods or their goals, and his own beliefs are distasteful to them. He's in this for his own benefit. He's made it abundantly clear just how limited his sense of loyalty, attachment, and concern for the other PC's is. It would be incredibly surprising if the party didn't reevaluate whether to boot the sorcerer off the island. I personally would consider that a good scene, with the CN sorcerer being forced to evaluate what value he has in continuing with the group (presumably larger than he's been willing to admit). The thing is, even from a CN perspective, the party has a valid complaint. If the relationship isn't mutually beneficial, why should it continue? Aren't they free to go their own way? It's not like the party is angry at him for not throwing himself in front of the charging dire rhino. The party might not have a right to ask him to sacrifice himself for their interests, but they have a reasonable expectation that he won't be actively working against their interests. And if the player really feels the character is like, "Screw you. My interests and needs are more important yours.", then maybe it's time to mark down CE... and possibly retire the character and start a new one that fits in more. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Chaotic Neutral the Good Man's Evil?
Top