Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Chaotic Neutral the Good Man's Evil?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 6563197" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>You can almost always snare a nerd or three with an alignment discussion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would hope that it doesn't become necessary. Intraparty interaction of any sort is the core of good RP. If your PC's don't regularly interact with other PC's in character, you aren't yet a mature roleplaying group no matter how well you interact with NPCs.</p><p></p><p>But eventually, if you have a party with really diverse ethical beliefs, once those beliefs are acted on it becomes increasingly difficult to justify IC the party staying together - doubly so if party members start working against each other's interests. And the better the RP is and the better the characterization, the more this is true rather than the less. At some point, players have to come up with IC compromises of one or more player's that allow the party to continue and give room for the relationship to continue. The online web-comic "Order of the Stick" does an awesome job of showing this, particularly in the relationship between the LG Roy Greenhilt and the CE Belkar Bitterleaf. Right now, the conflict is less over the zealous inquisitorial ways of the righteous party core, than it is over the selfish and increasingly destructive behavior of the party's arcane mercenary so I put the primary burden on that player to figure out how to IC mollify the rest of the party. Typically, what you see is player's choosing to ignore the behavior, which isn't an IC solution. It keeps the game going, but it isn't good role-playing. It's great that no one is taking in character actions personally - that's as it should be - but if your character doesn't take someone screwing them over personally, then it's a bit weird. </p><p></p><p>And yes, PC's not getting along perfectly is often the basis of really great RP. There is a vast range of justifications you can employ that add depth to a character when you answer a question like, "Why do you still hang around people you don't like?"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 6563197, member: 4937"] You can almost always snare a nerd or three with an alignment discussion. I would hope that it doesn't become necessary. Intraparty interaction of any sort is the core of good RP. If your PC's don't regularly interact with other PC's in character, you aren't yet a mature roleplaying group no matter how well you interact with NPCs. But eventually, if you have a party with really diverse ethical beliefs, once those beliefs are acted on it becomes increasingly difficult to justify IC the party staying together - doubly so if party members start working against each other's interests. And the better the RP is and the better the characterization, the more this is true rather than the less. At some point, players have to come up with IC compromises of one or more player's that allow the party to continue and give room for the relationship to continue. The online web-comic "Order of the Stick" does an awesome job of showing this, particularly in the relationship between the LG Roy Greenhilt and the CE Belkar Bitterleaf. Right now, the conflict is less over the zealous inquisitorial ways of the righteous party core, than it is over the selfish and increasingly destructive behavior of the party's arcane mercenary so I put the primary burden on that player to figure out how to IC mollify the rest of the party. Typically, what you see is player's choosing to ignore the behavior, which isn't an IC solution. It keeps the game going, but it isn't good role-playing. It's great that no one is taking in character actions personally - that's as it should be - but if your character doesn't take someone screwing them over personally, then it's a bit weird. And yes, PC's not getting along perfectly is often the basis of really great RP. There is a vast range of justifications you can employ that add depth to a character when you answer a question like, "Why do you still hang around people you don't like?" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Chaotic Neutral the Good Man's Evil?
Top