Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9614763" data-attributes="member: 93670">Yea  of 4e's ADEU∆ design is a totally different beast with a totally different set of cost/benefit considerations that are separate from 5e's attrition model.  Although I think that some of the more egregious & difficult for the GM to solve unaided wounds in 5e's attrition based design are directly blooming in the overly type efforts to shoehorn easily accessable ADEU player facing options into core§.  Having those player facing hooks pulled so far that direction without even so much as a UA providing drop in optional/variant rules for the GM to drag their campaign's baseline back towards attrition with the shield of an official wotc blessing leads to a scenario where the trouble just gets worse or shifts to "I'm mad that Alice nerfed us, this can't possibly work [and I intend to prove it  can't by doing nothing to adapt to her needs]"∆ At will, Daily, Encounter, Universal §  short rest classes, effectively all or nothing rests that encourage players to rest early often and try again if interrupted, neovancian casting, etc</blockquote>