Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is D&D Art?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wrecan" data-source="post: 5647802" data-attributes="member: 64825"><p>Not in the context of the paragraph we're discussing. The first sentence of the paragraph makes clear that the rest of the paragraph is simply categorizing different types of art.</p><p></p><p>While "craft" in the abstract need not be art (depending on one's definition of "art"), in that paragraph, it is.</p><p></p><p>Here is the first sentence of the wiki:</p><p>"<strong>Art</strong> is the product or process of deliberately arranging items (often with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbol" target="_blank">symbolic</a> significance) in a way that influences and affects one or more of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senses" target="_blank">senses</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotions" target="_blank">emotions</a>, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellect" target="_blank">intellect</a>."</p><p></p><p>It does not include an intention <strong>to create art</strong>. It includes an intention to affect the sense, emotions and intellect. If that is your definition of art, then D&D should be included in it, as it affects the senses, emotions, and intellect.</p><p></p><p>Fine. But I don't believe your professors gave you a circular definition of art. I have more faith in professors than that.</p><p></p><p>Yes, he is. And "intentionalism" does not use the circular definition of art that you did. Because Wollheim is amore rigorous academic and he would define art in a more rigorous way. (Which he does in his books.)</p><p></p><p>For instance, the Noel Carroll excerpt you quote properly characterizes the intentionalist theory as art requiring an intent to produce something that is "aesthetic". And "aesthetic" means "pleasing to the senses", which is probably where the wiki author devised that initial sentence that I quote above. (And under whose definition, D&D would apply.)</p><p></p><p>The two concepts need not be mutually exclusive, and certainly aren't under an intentionalist definition, as improvisational theater games are both intentionalist art (as there is an intent to create an aesthetically pleasing performance) and game (as there are some conventions of play, no predetermined outcome, and an intention to be diverted).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wrecan, post: 5647802, member: 64825"] Not in the context of the paragraph we're discussing. The first sentence of the paragraph makes clear that the rest of the paragraph is simply categorizing different types of art. While "craft" in the abstract need not be art (depending on one's definition of "art"), in that paragraph, it is. Here is the first sentence of the wiki: "[B]Art[/B] is the product or process of deliberately arranging items (often with [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbol"]symbolic[/URL] significance) in a way that influences and affects one or more of the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senses"]senses[/URL], [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotions"]emotions[/URL], and [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellect"]intellect[/URL]." It does not include an intention [B]to create art[/B]. It includes an intention to affect the sense, emotions and intellect. If that is your definition of art, then D&D should be included in it, as it affects the senses, emotions, and intellect. Fine. But I don't believe your professors gave you a circular definition of art. I have more faith in professors than that. Yes, he is. And "intentionalism" does not use the circular definition of art that you did. Because Wollheim is amore rigorous academic and he would define art in a more rigorous way. (Which he does in his books.) For instance, the Noel Carroll excerpt you quote properly characterizes the intentionalist theory as art requiring an intent to produce something that is "aesthetic". And "aesthetic" means "pleasing to the senses", which is probably where the wiki author devised that initial sentence that I quote above. (And under whose definition, D&D would apply.) The two concepts need not be mutually exclusive, and certainly aren't under an intentionalist definition, as improvisational theater games are both intentionalist art (as there is an intent to create an aesthetically pleasing performance) and game (as there are some conventions of play, no predetermined outcome, and an intention to be diverted). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is D&D Art?
Top