Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is D&D/D20 Childish and Immature?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SHARK" data-source="post: 349406" data-attributes="member: 1131"><p>Greetings!</p><p></p><p>I was reading the Harn Forums for awhile, and the discussion evolved to various points, some of which were that D&D has "childish ideas" and that people who play D&D are "obsessed with childish, immature concepts and ideas" as Kaptain Kantrip notes. It got me to thinking--are there childish, immature concepts that people who play D&D embrace? Are these concepts something that I am unaware of? Have any of you found this to be true? If so--what exactly are the childish, immature concepts? If you can think of any--and explain them--how might we, or myself, as a D&D player, go about correcting these childish, immature concepts?</p><p></p><p>Has the game that so many of us love, and have been playing for upwards of 20 years or more, somehow devolved into jello for Barney? A gibbering game for children?</p><p></p><p>I certainly don't want childish, immature concepts to ruin my game. Do many of you have any people in your groups that feel this way, or have identified these kinds of concepts? My own group has never really complained about any of these things, so maybe I'm really in the dark?</p><p></p><p>Has D&D reputation for being a game of wonder and imagination derailed into something for children?</p><p></p><p>What do you think?</p><p></p><p>I supply the following excerpts for context, concerning some potential problems with D&D.</p><p></p><p>I'd be very interested in what some of you think about this.</p><p></p><p>Semper Fidelis,</p><p></p><p>SHARK</p><p></p><p>Posted by Sir Eldaen:</p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>Quote:</p><p></p><p>"Um... yes, then my definition of "low-fantasy" is a little different. What I mean is: there is more than sufficient fantasy in both Hârn and LOTR, isn't it? Wouldn't that justify the term "med fantasy"? And if the fantasy in LOTR and Hârn is sufficient, credible, reasonable and sophisticated, doesn't that lead to the conclusion that adding more fantasy elements to this working system tends to make the whole thing ... silly? In my opinion, it surely does. I know this is beginning to get a flame, but I'm just so sick of having to justify against those high fantasy crowds! Why justify when it's so very clear that one is playing the supreme system/world/whatever? Why even discuss with people who defend childish ideas? Sorry, but that makes me really p...ed off!"</p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>End Quote.</p><p></p><p>Posted by Patrick S&S</p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>Quote:</p><p></p><p>"I left the EnWorld forum and will never set my foot there again after the last posts by some of the members there. Never in my whole life on the web have I seen such flames being thrown at people because they do not like the D&D rules. I understand that some of the members there are unhappy with the "childish" and "immature" comments that some here on these boards make but the last entries they added were rude and quite untrue. I really feel sorry for that Mobius guy (who are you on these forums?) and the replies he had to defend himself from. I am beginning to think that they are indeed childish..."</p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>End Quote.</p><p></p><p>Posted by Agrakanfury/Kaptain Kantrip</p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>Quote:</p><p></p><p>"You're only as good as your last post, I guess. I did forget you had previously supported my position. Sorry about that. </p><p></p><p>However, I do feel that D&D (and a fair number of its adherants) are obsessed with childish, immature ideas and concepts. I don't apologize for that, because I feel it's true and I've always felt this way after 1st edition (and I grew up)--this is long before I found Harn that I felt like this. </p><p></p><p>I am constantly frustrated by the lack of mature, realistic thought in many d20/D&D products which treat their audience like morons who will gobble up any old retarded lameness. WotC is just as guilty (if not more so) as some of the third party publishers. Harn doesn't do this. Every Harn product is quality, even if I can't use everything in it. There is no easy way for me to say this, so I just spit it out and call it as I see it. I can't aplogize for my belief, I can only say I'm sorry if you don't see the validity of my position in this matter."</p><p>____________________________________________________</p><p>End Quote.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SHARK, post: 349406, member: 1131"] Greetings! I was reading the Harn Forums for awhile, and the discussion evolved to various points, some of which were that D&D has "childish ideas" and that people who play D&D are "obsessed with childish, immature concepts and ideas" as Kaptain Kantrip notes. It got me to thinking--are there childish, immature concepts that people who play D&D embrace? Are these concepts something that I am unaware of? Have any of you found this to be true? If so--what exactly are the childish, immature concepts? If you can think of any--and explain them--how might we, or myself, as a D&D player, go about correcting these childish, immature concepts? Has the game that so many of us love, and have been playing for upwards of 20 years or more, somehow devolved into jello for Barney? A gibbering game for children? I certainly don't want childish, immature concepts to ruin my game. Do many of you have any people in your groups that feel this way, or have identified these kinds of concepts? My own group has never really complained about any of these things, so maybe I'm really in the dark? Has D&D reputation for being a game of wonder and imagination derailed into something for children? What do you think? I supply the following excerpts for context, concerning some potential problems with D&D. I'd be very interested in what some of you think about this. Semper Fidelis, SHARK Posted by Sir Eldaen: ____________________________________________________ Quote: "Um... yes, then my definition of "low-fantasy" is a little different. What I mean is: there is more than sufficient fantasy in both Hârn and LOTR, isn't it? Wouldn't that justify the term "med fantasy"? And if the fantasy in LOTR and Hârn is sufficient, credible, reasonable and sophisticated, doesn't that lead to the conclusion that adding more fantasy elements to this working system tends to make the whole thing ... silly? In my opinion, it surely does. I know this is beginning to get a flame, but I'm just so sick of having to justify against those high fantasy crowds! Why justify when it's so very clear that one is playing the supreme system/world/whatever? Why even discuss with people who defend childish ideas? Sorry, but that makes me really p...ed off!" ____________________________________________________ End Quote. Posted by Patrick S&S ____________________________________________________ Quote: "I left the EnWorld forum and will never set my foot there again after the last posts by some of the members there. Never in my whole life on the web have I seen such flames being thrown at people because they do not like the D&D rules. I understand that some of the members there are unhappy with the "childish" and "immature" comments that some here on these boards make but the last entries they added were rude and quite untrue. I really feel sorry for that Mobius guy (who are you on these forums?) and the replies he had to defend himself from. I am beginning to think that they are indeed childish..." ____________________________________________________ End Quote. Posted by Agrakanfury/Kaptain Kantrip ____________________________________________________ Quote: "You're only as good as your last post, I guess. I did forget you had previously supported my position. Sorry about that. However, I do feel that D&D (and a fair number of its adherants) are obsessed with childish, immature ideas and concepts. I don't apologize for that, because I feel it's true and I've always felt this way after 1st edition (and I grew up)--this is long before I found Harn that I felt like this. I am constantly frustrated by the lack of mature, realistic thought in many d20/D&D products which treat their audience like morons who will gobble up any old retarded lameness. WotC is just as guilty (if not more so) as some of the third party publishers. Harn doesn't do this. Every Harn product is quality, even if I can't use everything in it. There is no easy way for me to say this, so I just spit it out and call it as I see it. I can't aplogize for my belief, I can only say I'm sorry if you don't see the validity of my position in this matter." ____________________________________________________ End Quote. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is D&D/D20 Childish and Immature?
Top