Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="darjr" data-source="post: 9153798" data-attributes="member: 52905">PHB2 It was called Tasha’sThey’ve said why they abandoned the idea of PHB 2 and DMG 2. A significant number of people thought it was a new version of the core book instead of an expansion.Edit to add verbiage from a post way down in the thread:OK. I gave it some thought more thought and went for a walk and re read what he wrote. I think he picked bad phrasing.What I think he's getting at is that the RPG isn't getting the lions share of the funding. And in his opinion it shows and WotC is doing it intentionally. Possibly making a mistake.I think it's entirely possible that the lions share of the funding is now going to the VTT and DNDBeyond and then the RPG, in that order. However I think that's just perception on our side, if Matt has more insider info, which he just might, we can only guess. However it does seem like that's the order of things from out here.So if that's what he's getting at? I agree. I don't think it should be reflected in more products or even the products he mentions as missing. But I think a united leadership of D&amp;D (which would cost money) and more time to develop ideas and develop products could be useful.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="darjr, post: 9153798, member: 52905"] PHB2 It was called Tasha’s They’ve said why they abandoned the idea of PHB 2 and DMG 2. A significant number of people thought it was a new version of the core book instead of an expansion. Edit to add verbiage from a post way down in the thread: OK. I gave it some thought more thought and went for a walk and re read what he wrote. I think he picked bad phrasing. What I think he's getting at is that the RPG isn't getting the lions share of the funding. And in his opinion it shows and WotC is doing it intentionally. Possibly making a mistake. I think it's entirely possible that the lions share of the funding is now going to the VTT and DNDBeyond and then the RPG, in that order. However I think that's just perception on our side, if Matt has more insider info, which he just might, we can only guess. However it does seem like that's the order of things from out here. So if that's what he's getting at? I agree. I don't think it should be reflected in more products or even the products he mentions as missing. But I think a united leadership of D&D (which would cost money) and more time to develop ideas and develop products could be useful. [/QUOTE]

Verification