Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 9154127" data-attributes="member: 996">A new revision... which, I mean, you're 100% right, that's the opposite of being mothballed.But they really are insisting it's a revision of 5e, not a new edition. And it sounds like it will not be very different from 5e, at all.IDK why I feel like that matters, but it does...?Maybe because it (the slow pace of release) reminds me of the way D&amp;D was published back in the day, and 5e.2024 reminds me of how little the differences among the 'two prong approach' and 1e vs 2e felt at that time?Well, it's not certain, then, and it sound like a lot of mistake were made apart from the pace of publications. And, 2e is only one of a half-dozen examples I gave of RPGs (and one TT game with a lot of crossover that arguably started the trend) that fire-hosed away from the mid/late 80s through the 90s and into the aughts.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 9154127, member: 996"] A new [I]revision...[/I] which, I mean, you're 100% right, that's the opposite of being mothballed. But they really are insisting it's a revision of 5e, not a new edition. And it sounds like it will not be very different from 5e, at all. IDK why I feel like that matters, but it does...? Maybe because it (the slow pace of release) reminds me of the way D&D was published back in the day, and 5e.2024 reminds me of how little the differences among the 'two prong approach' and 1e vs 2e felt at that time? Well, it's not certain, then, and it sound like a lot of mistake were made apart from the pace of publications. And, 2e is only one of a half-dozen examples I gave of RPGs (and one TT game with a lot of crossover that arguably started the trend) that fire-hosed away from the mid/late 80s through the 90s and into the aughts. [/QUOTE]

Verification