Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is DnD being mothballed?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9156369" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>None of that is investing significantly more than 2014.</p><p></p><p>I don't understand why you think that it is. To WotC it's just a brand refresh, and creating the new PHB/DMG/MM is likely costing them a similar relative amount to the original 5E ones, which is to say - not very much. They've only got 30 people working on them.</p><p></p><p>Trying new formats at higher prices indicates experimentation, it doesn't indicate investment. That's pretty simple. If you think it does indicate investment, you'll need to explain how. Historically this sort of experimentation is commonly seen just before a company gets into serious financial trouble. I don't think that will happen with D&D, but it is interesting - I suspect it means there's an exec out there who thinks D&D needs to make more cash, but isn't willing to put more money into D&D, so is having them twiddle with the format.</p><p></p><p>As for "internally vs freelancers", well, they've had about 30 people on D&D for a long time. They're not making significantly more books than they used to, nor are they making those books have more content - on the contrary for the last few years there's been a trend towards less content per book. So that doesn't indicate any significant investment that I can see.</p><p></p><p>It may be that WotC is spending, say, 20-30% more on D&D now than in 2014, but D&D has 300%+ more customers than it did in 2014, so I think it's fair to say that's not "significantly more".</p><p></p><p>Especially in the context of the 3D VTT. Let's assume D&D workers, and 3D VTT people are paid the same, cost the company the same - I doubt this, almost certainly the 3D VTT people are vastly more expensive, but let's pretend. Let's say each costs WotC $100k/year.</p><p></p><p>D&D has, last I heard, about 30 people on it, that's costing WotC $3m per year. The 3D VTT, according to Cynthia Williams, has 250 people on it. That's costing WotC about $25m per year - over eight times as much. Thus even if D&D had had 30 people on it from day 1, the 3D VTT project is going to cost more than the entire decade of D&D in 2 years of existing. Do you see the gigantic difference in investment and thus internal corporate interest? The 3D VTT is the sort of thing that makes and breaks corporate careers. D&D itself, as a game, is likely not seen that way inside WotC (however foolishly), I would suggest.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9156369, member: 18"] None of that is investing significantly more than 2014. I don't understand why you think that it is. To WotC it's just a brand refresh, and creating the new PHB/DMG/MM is likely costing them a similar relative amount to the original 5E ones, which is to say - not very much. They've only got 30 people working on them. Trying new formats at higher prices indicates experimentation, it doesn't indicate investment. That's pretty simple. If you think it does indicate investment, you'll need to explain how. Historically this sort of experimentation is commonly seen just before a company gets into serious financial trouble. I don't think that will happen with D&D, but it is interesting - I suspect it means there's an exec out there who thinks D&D needs to make more cash, but isn't willing to put more money into D&D, so is having them twiddle with the format. As for "internally vs freelancers", well, they've had about 30 people on D&D for a long time. They're not making significantly more books than they used to, nor are they making those books have more content - on the contrary for the last few years there's been a trend towards less content per book. So that doesn't indicate any significant investment that I can see. It may be that WotC is spending, say, 20-30% more on D&D now than in 2014, but D&D has 300%+ more customers than it did in 2014, so I think it's fair to say that's not "significantly more". Especially in the context of the 3D VTT. Let's assume D&D workers, and 3D VTT people are paid the same, cost the company the same - I doubt this, almost certainly the 3D VTT people are vastly more expensive, but let's pretend. Let's say each costs WotC $100k/year. D&D has, last I heard, about 30 people on it, that's costing WotC $3m per year. The 3D VTT, according to Cynthia Williams, has 250 people on it. That's costing WotC about $25m per year - over eight times as much. Thus even if D&D had had 30 people on it from day 1, the 3D VTT project is going to cost more than the entire decade of D&D in 2 years of existing. Do you see the gigantic difference in investment and thus internal corporate interest? The 3D VTT is the sort of thing that makes and breaks corporate careers. D&D itself, as a game, is likely not seen that way inside WotC (however foolishly), I would suggest. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is DnD being mothballed?
Top