Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is DnD next chasing a pipedream?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 6057178" data-attributes="member: 59506"><p>First, WotC is trying to make D&D Next attractive to <em>everybody</em>, and not specifically targeting only Pathfinder players. In order for D&D Next to be successful, they need to target all D&D fans, regardless of edition (and I consider Pathfinder an edition of D&D). Also, not all D&D fans limit themselves to just one game or edition...including Pathfinder fans. Just because one plays Pathfinder, or even <em>prefers</em> Pathfinder, it doesn't necessarily follow that one will only play Pathfinder to the exclusion of any other game system. Even if only a percentage of Pathfinder fans buy the core books for D&D Next, even if only to occasionally play with friends that do play D&D Next, then WotC has accomplished it's goals...they sold D&D Books.</p><p> </p><p>Second, WotC is not making D&D Next like 3.5...or at least more accurately...not exclusively making it like 3.5. There's elements of all past editions in there, and yet no straight copies of mechanics from any edition. It's being made to play <em>like</em> any previous edition of D&D, not direct mechanical clones of every edition.</p><p> </p><p>Third, D&D Next is far from a finished product. It's system mechanics are going to drift around quite a lot...sometimes closer to this, sometimes closer to that...before the final form of the game is reached. Even then, I imagine it will still have some malleability as new ideas, errata's, and module concepts are developed. (Though hopefully not as much errata as past editions...).</p><p> </p><p>Fourth, whether pipedream or not (and everybody is entitled to and has their own opinion on this), WotC really has no other choice right now. If they want to keep D&D financially viable, this is what they have to do.</p><p> </p><p>Fifth, if D&D Next doesn't accomplish what WotC needs it to (financially), they have only one other option as far as I see. Develop DDI to support all editions of D&D (including Pathfinder), and make their money from subscription services and electronic sales of past material.</p><p> </p><p><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/glasses.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="B-)" title="Glasses B-)" data-shortname="B-)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Mahdi, post: 6057178, member: 59506"] First, WotC is trying to make D&D Next attractive to [I]everybody[/I], and not specifically targeting only Pathfinder players. In order for D&D Next to be successful, they need to target all D&D fans, regardless of edition (and I consider Pathfinder an edition of D&D). Also, not all D&D fans limit themselves to just one game or edition...including Pathfinder fans. Just because one plays Pathfinder, or even [I]prefers[/I] Pathfinder, it doesn't necessarily follow that one will only play Pathfinder to the exclusion of any other game system. Even if only a percentage of Pathfinder fans buy the core books for D&D Next, even if only to occasionally play with friends that do play D&D Next, then WotC has accomplished it's goals...they sold D&D Books. Second, WotC is not making D&D Next like 3.5...or at least more accurately...not exclusively making it like 3.5. There's elements of all past editions in there, and yet no straight copies of mechanics from any edition. It's being made to play [I]like[/I] any previous edition of D&D, not direct mechanical clones of every edition. Third, D&D Next is far from a finished product. It's system mechanics are going to drift around quite a lot...sometimes closer to this, sometimes closer to that...before the final form of the game is reached. Even then, I imagine it will still have some malleability as new ideas, errata's, and module concepts are developed. (Though hopefully not as much errata as past editions...). Fourth, whether pipedream or not (and everybody is entitled to and has their own opinion on this), WotC really has no other choice right now. If they want to keep D&D financially viable, this is what they have to do. Fifth, if D&D Next doesn't accomplish what WotC needs it to (financially), they have only one other option as far as I see. Develop DDI to support all editions of D&D (including Pathfinder), and make their money from subscription services and electronic sales of past material. B-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is DnD next chasing a pipedream?
Top