Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Methos" data-source="post: 2095551" data-attributes="member: 5734">March 2005 Issue - I found it relevantI have to admit, that while I don't find Dragon always relevant in every single article, feature, etc., I do generally find something of value in each issue. In addition, I occassionally find a real gem, IMO.  In the March issue, the feature on Pazazu was excellent.  I am going to be designing a new campaign, and I'm currently developing the ideas at a high level.  One of the key things that I always do when I DM a campaign is to scope out an outline of the campaign world overall and on a more regional level where the PC's will initially be placed scope out the major features, which includes the key antogonists of the campaign.  I've been wanting to put in some sort of an evil cult (or two even) that would form potentially the basis for different adventures/stories within the campaign.  I really liked the discussion of Pazazu and thus will be including a cult devoted to him with various NPC's, etc being involved in it.  In addition, I will likely be including Kenku in my campaign as well, since I don't believe any of the players in my campaign have been exposed to them before.  So, in a nutshell, I still find Dragon relevant.Also, I do like the way, they are tying in features in Dragon with adventures in Dungeon even if I don't use everything verbatim.  cheersMethos</blockquote>