Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Encounters dying?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Herremann the Wise" data-source="post: 5502508" data-attributes="member: 11300"><p>Incorrect. It would of made me think "don't do that, strongly advocating and beating the Pathfinder drum is not going to help a single jot and could only alienate 4e players who may have been encouraged to try it". My "posturing" was in response to both the content and tenor of the partisan post that I quoted and your initial "pile-on" post that blindly assumed that Samurai was just relying on folks turning up and that was why he was having trouble keeping Encounters going. I am only responding to what you have posted and considering that I'm edition neutral, I would hesitate to title that "posturing".</p><p><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /></p><p>Just "<em>some</em>" of the players playing it huh? I think that is the primary problem I have with your post - the rest I just disagree with.</p><p>There's no point mincing your words in an obfuscatory cloud of qualifications; it's six of one, half a dozen of the other. It's like gravy on roast beef or maple syrup on pancakes. They BOTH taste good. Encounters should be about getting people to try something that's fun, not an opportunity for partisan comparison against other systems. WotC made this marketing mistake when introducing 4e and there is little to be gained in repeating it.</p><p>Incorrect. You were "advocating" a particularly partisan approach; I was "suggesting" a more inclusive approach that would hopefully not alienate potential players or isolate the poor DM trying to organise it. I see significant differences between our two approaches. Lost in all of this is the unfortunate thing that Samurai has not sat on his bum with Encounters but has actively and repeatedly tried to get Encounters happening and literally needs just one more player turning up to keep the ball rolling. That must be very frustrating.</p><p>My suggestion then is not to send out matter-of-fact-not-meant-to-be-nice-<em>some</em>-Pathfinder-players-are-sheep volleys in the first place. It does nothing to assist and can only ever lead to further division in a hobby that <strong><em>really </em></strong>doesn't need it.</p><p></p><p>Best Regards</p><p>Herremann the Wise</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Herremann the Wise, post: 5502508, member: 11300"] Incorrect. It would of made me think "don't do that, strongly advocating and beating the Pathfinder drum is not going to help a single jot and could only alienate 4e players who may have been encouraged to try it". My "posturing" was in response to both the content and tenor of the partisan post that I quoted and your initial "pile-on" post that blindly assumed that Samurai was just relying on folks turning up and that was why he was having trouble keeping Encounters going. I am only responding to what you have posted and considering that I'm edition neutral, I would hesitate to title that "posturing". :erm: Just "[I]some[/I]" of the players playing it huh? I think that is the primary problem I have with your post - the rest I just disagree with. There's no point mincing your words in an obfuscatory cloud of qualifications; it's six of one, half a dozen of the other. It's like gravy on roast beef or maple syrup on pancakes. They BOTH taste good. Encounters should be about getting people to try something that's fun, not an opportunity for partisan comparison against other systems. WotC made this marketing mistake when introducing 4e and there is little to be gained in repeating it. Incorrect. You were "advocating" a particularly partisan approach; I was "suggesting" a more inclusive approach that would hopefully not alienate potential players or isolate the poor DM trying to organise it. I see significant differences between our two approaches. Lost in all of this is the unfortunate thing that Samurai has not sat on his bum with Encounters but has actively and repeatedly tried to get Encounters happening and literally needs just one more player turning up to keep the ball rolling. That must be very frustrating. My suggestion then is not to send out matter-of-fact-not-meant-to-be-nice-[I]some[/I]-Pathfinder-players-are-sheep volleys in the first place. It does nothing to assist and can only ever lead to further division in a hobby that [B][I]really [/I][/B]doesn't need it. Best Regards Herremann the Wise [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Encounters dying?
Top