Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7372692" data-attributes="member: 6919838">Wayof theFour"Sounds like we run games differently. My world has already been designed before the PCs enter play. What they decide to do with it is their decision. That usually means they won't be spending the entire games in the ranger's favored terrain, but in a number of different environments they decide to explore. Or it could mean they spend the entire time in the ranger's favored terrain. It all depends on the characters' actions."Yet didnt you just put forth the idea that for when wilderness stuff would matter "(except when the ranger is in his/her favored terrain, which probably won't be more than 20% of the time)."   So, if the character's including the ranger in your games are choosin 80% of the time to go into non-favored wilderness over favored wilderness... is that because they want intentionally to gimp their teammate? or is it posdible that the world you put foryh and the leads thry find and missions they come across influence them to go into what are clearly areas they will be worse off in? i mean, it seems like if they had equally appealing offers and opportunities in what amounts to "home field advantage" areas, they would choose those over less advantageous ones more than 1 time in 5, doesn't it?</blockquote>