Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Forgotten Realms the Default Campaign Setting for 5e?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 7909382" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>I think Crawford’s answer was both clear and accurate. There is an official D&D setting, and it is “the multiverse.” This is similar to Magic: the Gathering where all the various planes that may be the focus of one set or another exist within a unified meta-setting, also called “the multiverse.”* All the different D&D settings exist within this meta-setting, which has certain baseline assumptions, such as the great wheel cosmology and D&D’s magic system.** The Forgotten Realms is just one setting among many that exists within the official meta-setting. It’s no more “default” than Dominaria is the “default” plane in Magic: the Gathering. Which is to say, yes, it holds a significant place within official canon, due to being the focal point of a majority of the official material, especially early on in the brand’s life cycle.</p><p></p><p>But that’s kind of circumstantial. It could easily change, especially if there is a lot of consumer demand for canon material focusing on other settings. We saw that happen with Magic, where WotC tested the waters first with a block set in Otaria (which is on Dominaria but is nonetheless pretty distinct from what they had been doing up until then), then branching out into more different settings, and at this point Ravnica is practically an equally prevalent plane in Magic canon to Dominaria. We’re starting to see them do the same thing with D&D, where they tested the waters with Eberron, and now it looks like they’re going to continue releasing material for other settings. With the success of Wildemount, who knows, Exandria could end up becoming the Ravnica to Aber-Toril’s Dominaria.</p><p></p><p>All that said, I don’t think WotC has any plans to “move on” from the Forgotten Realms any time soon. Mearls’ answer gives a great explanation of the value of having a setting that they can lean so heavily on, and I doubt they’re eager to lose those advantages. For these reasons, I voted for “friends with benefits.” Forgotten Realms isn’t the <em>official</em> setting. It’s sort of functionally the “default” setting for the time being, but only in the sense that they’ve been focusing heavily on it, there’s no reason they can’t or won’t shift that focus if they think the benefits of doing so will outweigh the costs. Even if that happens though (and I do think we’re starting to see it happen,) that won’t be “Moving On.” Forgotten Realms will probably always hold a special position in D&D canon, just as Dominaria still holds a special position in Magic canon, and sets that focus on it are always treated as big, special events and play hard on longtime fans’ nostalgia.</p><p></p><p>*and with the various Planeshift documents and Guildmaster’s Guide to Ravnica, they are arguably the same meta-setting, at least in D&D canon if not in Magic canon.</p><p></p><p>**This of course calls the unity of D&D’s multiverse and Magic’s multiverse into question, since they have different cosmological assumptions and different hard magic systems. But YMMV on how much that really matters to you. And anyway, there are other official D&D settings that bend or even break these assumptions. The current approach seems to be to handwave these setting inconsistencies with some vague mysticbabble, and fair enough if you ask me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 7909382, member: 6779196"] I think Crawford’s answer was both clear and accurate. There is an official D&D setting, and it is “the multiverse.” This is similar to Magic: the Gathering where all the various planes that may be the focus of one set or another exist within a unified meta-setting, also called “the multiverse.”* All the different D&D settings exist within this meta-setting, which has certain baseline assumptions, such as the great wheel cosmology and D&D’s magic system.** The Forgotten Realms is just one setting among many that exists within the official meta-setting. It’s no more “default” than Dominaria is the “default” plane in Magic: the Gathering. Which is to say, yes, it holds a significant place within official canon, due to being the focal point of a majority of the official material, especially early on in the brand’s life cycle. But that’s kind of circumstantial. It could easily change, especially if there is a lot of consumer demand for canon material focusing on other settings. We saw that happen with Magic, where WotC tested the waters first with a block set in Otaria (which is on Dominaria but is nonetheless pretty distinct from what they had been doing up until then), then branching out into more different settings, and at this point Ravnica is practically an equally prevalent plane in Magic canon to Dominaria. We’re starting to see them do the same thing with D&D, where they tested the waters with Eberron, and now it looks like they’re going to continue releasing material for other settings. With the success of Wildemount, who knows, Exandria could end up becoming the Ravnica to Aber-Toril’s Dominaria. All that said, I don’t think WotC has any plans to “move on” from the Forgotten Realms any time soon. Mearls’ answer gives a great explanation of the value of having a setting that they can lean so heavily on, and I doubt they’re eager to lose those advantages. For these reasons, I voted for “friends with benefits.” Forgotten Realms isn’t the [I]official[/I] setting. It’s sort of functionally the “default” setting for the time being, but only in the sense that they’ve been focusing heavily on it, there’s no reason they can’t or won’t shift that focus if they think the benefits of doing so will outweigh the costs. Even if that happens though (and I do think we’re starting to see it happen,) that won’t be “Moving On.” Forgotten Realms will probably always hold a special position in D&D canon, just as Dominaria still holds a special position in Magic canon, and sets that focus on it are always treated as big, special events and play hard on longtime fans’ nostalgia. *and with the various Planeshift documents and Guildmaster’s Guide to Ravnica, they are arguably the same meta-setting, at least in D&D canon if not in Magic canon. **This of course calls the unity of D&D’s multiverse and Magic’s multiverse into question, since they have different cosmological assumptions and different hard magic systems. But YMMV on how much that really matters to you. And anyway, there are other official D&D settings that bend or even break these assumptions. The current approach seems to be to handwave these setting inconsistencies with some vague mysticbabble, and fair enough if you ask me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Forgotten Realms the Default Campaign Setting for 5e?
Top