Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Is Global Warming real?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6684849" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>So, I'd like to elucidate a few of the emotional issues involved in the Climate Change discussion. Any and all of these can come into play, and make it very difficult to engage in constructive discussion. These things can make a person's brain into a crazed weasel within your skull, searching for *any* way to not accept points.</p><p></p><p>1) Us vs Them. In the US (and other places in the world) this topic is, for several reasons, attached to political parties/philosophies. Generally, people of the other party are The Enemy. And The Enemy cannot be allowed to win. A staunch member of one party or philosophy will emotionally resist the notion not on any merits of the notion, but because it comes from the other side - a kind of internal <em>ad hominem</em>, dismissing and resisting the notion due to who its proponents are.</p><p></p><p>2) Admitting you are Wrong. This is a big one. Nobody likes to admit they are wrong. If you say, even just to yourself, "I believe X is true," then any argument against X is a challenge to you, and engages not just your reason, but your ego - in effect, admitting you are wrong entails a sort of loss of status and face to the group, and nobody likes to face that.</p><p></p><p>3) Accepting Responsibility. Similar to admitting you are wrong - but this isn't just about an intellectual curiosity. This is *real*. If you accept antrhopogenic climate change, you accept that *WE* did this. We undertook Wrong Action, and have actively resisted correction, making things worse - it is confessing guilt, which most folks really don't like doing.</p><p></p><p>4) Accepting the Cost of Action. If you Accept Responsibility, you then also accept that it is up to you to do something. This will be difficult and expensive. It is so, so much easier to reject the notion, and not accept the cost and effort and change in our lives required to make it better.</p><p></p><p>5) This Crap Is Scary. We are talking about things that could mean, on the one end, massive property damage and loss of life, to the other end, destruction of all current coastal cities and perhaps reducing the planet to being no longer suitable to what we currently consider civilization. Humans are known to avoid fear and anxiety through denial and rejection.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6684849, member: 177"] So, I'd like to elucidate a few of the emotional issues involved in the Climate Change discussion. Any and all of these can come into play, and make it very difficult to engage in constructive discussion. These things can make a person's brain into a crazed weasel within your skull, searching for *any* way to not accept points. 1) Us vs Them. In the US (and other places in the world) this topic is, for several reasons, attached to political parties/philosophies. Generally, people of the other party are The Enemy. And The Enemy cannot be allowed to win. A staunch member of one party or philosophy will emotionally resist the notion not on any merits of the notion, but because it comes from the other side - a kind of internal [I]ad hominem[/I], dismissing and resisting the notion due to who its proponents are. 2) Admitting you are Wrong. This is a big one. Nobody likes to admit they are wrong. If you say, even just to yourself, "I believe X is true," then any argument against X is a challenge to you, and engages not just your reason, but your ego - in effect, admitting you are wrong entails a sort of loss of status and face to the group, and nobody likes to face that. 3) Accepting Responsibility. Similar to admitting you are wrong - but this isn't just about an intellectual curiosity. This is *real*. If you accept antrhopogenic climate change, you accept that *WE* did this. We undertook Wrong Action, and have actively resisted correction, making things worse - it is confessing guilt, which most folks really don't like doing. 4) Accepting the Cost of Action. If you Accept Responsibility, you then also accept that it is up to you to do something. This will be difficult and expensive. It is so, so much easier to reject the notion, and not accept the cost and effort and change in our lives required to make it better. 5) This Crap Is Scary. We are talking about things that could mean, on the one end, massive property damage and loss of life, to the other end, destruction of all current coastal cities and perhaps reducing the planet to being no longer suitable to what we currently consider civilization. Humans are known to avoid fear and anxiety through denial and rejection. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Is Global Warming real?
Top