Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is high randomness good for an RPG?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 4687267" data-attributes="member: 40961"><p>Your question is very broad. I voted "no," but I'm sure that what I see in your question is influenced by my own opinions and tastes.</p><p></p><p>I am an unabashed problem solver in games. I like to come up with ideas and to make strategic decisions in order to accomplish goals. Randomness, particularly in combat, can make this more interesting for me as long as the randomness isn't too extreme. By making combat involve many small decisions, and then randomizing the success of most of them, it gives me the opportunity to make tactical decisions and adapt to the success or failure of my previous efforts.</p><p> </p><p>Meanwhile, I loathe high degrees of randomness. I am an elitist on this issue, and I won't apologize for it. Not only does it frequently stop me from effectively planning or making strategic decisions, but its... mindless. I get no particular pleasure from rolling a 20, and no feeling of failure from rolling a 1. The odds of those things occuring were the same both before and after I actually rolled the dice.</p><p> </p><p>Some people like to talk about the drama of sudden success or tragic failure that is generated by "swingy" combat. I don't experience that drama. To me, its like talking about the drama of a lottery ticket or the game Deal or No Deal. There is no drama. Its purely mechanical. No one has any right to be proud of their success or to rue their failure.</p><p> </p><p>This isn't to say that no RPG should have high degrees of randomness. Some RPGs aren't about problem solving in the first place, or, they put the problem solving somewhere other than where they put the randomness. For example, Paranoia involves plenty of problem solving, the problems you solve are more about how to fast talk Friend Computer while screwing over your allies, and that's not randomized. Og: Unearthed involves problem solving, but its all about language and communication, so the highly random combat doesn't affect it. And Feng Shui really isn't about problem solving, its about badass combat description. So randomness is fine by me in those contexts.</p><p> </p><p>But in D&D where a big part of the game, at least for me, is "how can I and my team defeat the orcs that just attacked us?" I want random factors to spice things up, not negate the "how" in that sentence and turn everything into a mechanistic dice fest.</p><p></p><p>That sounds mathematically pointless. Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but if you have a randomized list of random chances, you can just multiply through and come up with the REAL random distribution, and then assign dice as necessary to accomplish it in one roll.</p><p></p><p>Gods no. I've played enough Battletech to know that this just makes things take longer without adding much. Again, any time you have one chart seeding you to another chart, you COULD just make one chart with all of the information. Or you could come up with a less chart based game, reducing the amount of time spent looking up data... that works too.</p><p></p><p>Its not fun for me. I concede that many others seem to enjoy this. I don't understand why.</p><p></p><p>Rolling randomly ISN'T good. Its that sheer gambler's thrill that I look down upon as beneath me.</p><p></p><p>Well, that's a little different question. Its probably less fun, particularly in an RPG context. But it has its place when you just want to take a character and trash a dungeon, and you don't have or want to spend prep time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cadfan, post: 4687267, member: 40961"] Your question is very broad. I voted "no," but I'm sure that what I see in your question is influenced by my own opinions and tastes. I am an unabashed problem solver in games. I like to come up with ideas and to make strategic decisions in order to accomplish goals. Randomness, particularly in combat, can make this more interesting for me as long as the randomness isn't too extreme. By making combat involve many small decisions, and then randomizing the success of most of them, it gives me the opportunity to make tactical decisions and adapt to the success or failure of my previous efforts. Meanwhile, I loathe high degrees of randomness. I am an elitist on this issue, and I won't apologize for it. Not only does it frequently stop me from effectively planning or making strategic decisions, but its... mindless. I get no particular pleasure from rolling a 20, and no feeling of failure from rolling a 1. The odds of those things occuring were the same both before and after I actually rolled the dice. Some people like to talk about the drama of sudden success or tragic failure that is generated by "swingy" combat. I don't experience that drama. To me, its like talking about the drama of a lottery ticket or the game Deal or No Deal. There is no drama. Its purely mechanical. No one has any right to be proud of their success or to rue their failure. This isn't to say that no RPG should have high degrees of randomness. Some RPGs aren't about problem solving in the first place, or, they put the problem solving somewhere other than where they put the randomness. For example, Paranoia involves plenty of problem solving, the problems you solve are more about how to fast talk Friend Computer while screwing over your allies, and that's not randomized. Og: Unearthed involves problem solving, but its all about language and communication, so the highly random combat doesn't affect it. And Feng Shui really isn't about problem solving, its about badass combat description. So randomness is fine by me in those contexts. But in D&D where a big part of the game, at least for me, is "how can I and my team defeat the orcs that just attacked us?" I want random factors to spice things up, not negate the "how" in that sentence and turn everything into a mechanistic dice fest. That sounds mathematically pointless. Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but if you have a randomized list of random chances, you can just multiply through and come up with the REAL random distribution, and then assign dice as necessary to accomplish it in one roll. Gods no. I've played enough Battletech to know that this just makes things take longer without adding much. Again, any time you have one chart seeding you to another chart, you COULD just make one chart with all of the information. Or you could come up with a less chart based game, reducing the amount of time spent looking up data... that works too. Its not fun for me. I concede that many others seem to enjoy this. I don't understand why. Rolling randomly ISN'T good. Its that sheer gambler's thrill that I look down upon as beneath me. Well, that's a little different question. Its probably less fun, particularly in an RPG context. But it has its place when you just want to take a character and trash a dungeon, and you don't have or want to spend prep time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is high randomness good for an RPG?
Top