Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is infinite diversity in infinite combinations .... a terrible thing in D&D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Waterbizkit" data-source="post: 7225920" data-attributes="member: 6802604"><p>Infinite possibilities. Never how I thought of it before, but I like it. It's the infinite possibilities that make this game so great. And no, I'm not talking strictly about races and classes as the OP is, though I'll get to that, I mean the infinite possibilities and diversity just in one gaming table to the next.</p><p></p><p>My game is different than your game, which is different from the next persons, whose is different from the next persons... ad infinitum! That's pretty f-ing cool in my opinion. We can all start out with the same building blocks, but what we construct in the end is all out own. Good stuff.</p><p></p><p>And yeah, that includes things like races and classes. My sweet spot is the kitchen sink. I like giving my players options, all the options. Core books, UA material, and even third party stuff as long as I get to look it over first and make sure it's not too wonky. If a player has an idea and it's a race or a class not already in "my" world... I add it. I've never found it too hard to find space for anything. More specifically, forget about it being "hard", it just doesn't phase me. I think of my campaign worlds less as "mine" more as "ours".</p><p></p><p>I swear I'm not some rainbows and sunshine hippy dippy whackadoo. I just <em>not bothered</em> by it. I don't carry my own personal biases into the game and I certainly <em>don't care</em> about how things "used to be". Don't care how things were an edition ago or three editions ago. If I want to play those games... there right over there on my bookshelf. That said, I've never gone back to playing a previous edition of the game, I always play what's current. Even so, if the mood struck me, the books are there waiting... watching... er, no, just waiting. </p><p></p><p>Now, every now and again I <em>do</em> get a hankering for something <em>heavily</em> thematic. Like say, an all dwarf party because the campaign is all about a dwarven mining expedition. Or maybe a party of all Paladins and Clerics, characters on some holy crusade. You get the idea. Either way I do find that when I restrict things like this the campaigns tend to be shorter, but all the same I'll run them when I get a nifty idea.</p><p></p><p>Additionally, if I'm running a published campaign setting, I will run it more or less "by the book". Which is to say if the setting comes with it's own set of restrictions, I'm probably going to adhere to them. These are cases similar to my "themed" campaigns in that if I really want to run Dark Sun, I'll run it by my players, make the settings themes and restrictions clear, and if I get the thumbs up we'll move forward.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, all of that said, and it's far more than I intended, I'm all for other folks running their games their way. That's the real infinite diversity I was on about to begin with. People don't need to like or agree with how I run my games, and that's cool. I've read enough posts around here by now to know there's some posters who run games I'd never sit down to, that's cool too.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I think my point was something like... whatever floats your boat man.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Waterbizkit, post: 7225920, member: 6802604"] Infinite possibilities. Never how I thought of it before, but I like it. It's the infinite possibilities that make this game so great. And no, I'm not talking strictly about races and classes as the OP is, though I'll get to that, I mean the infinite possibilities and diversity just in one gaming table to the next. My game is different than your game, which is different from the next persons, whose is different from the next persons... ad infinitum! That's pretty f-ing cool in my opinion. We can all start out with the same building blocks, but what we construct in the end is all out own. Good stuff. And yeah, that includes things like races and classes. My sweet spot is the kitchen sink. I like giving my players options, all the options. Core books, UA material, and even third party stuff as long as I get to look it over first and make sure it's not too wonky. If a player has an idea and it's a race or a class not already in "my" world... I add it. I've never found it too hard to find space for anything. More specifically, forget about it being "hard", it just doesn't phase me. I think of my campaign worlds less as "mine" more as "ours". I swear I'm not some rainbows and sunshine hippy dippy whackadoo. I just [I]not bothered[/I] by it. I don't carry my own personal biases into the game and I certainly [I]don't care[/I] about how things "used to be". Don't care how things were an edition ago or three editions ago. If I want to play those games... there right over there on my bookshelf. That said, I've never gone back to playing a previous edition of the game, I always play what's current. Even so, if the mood struck me, the books are there waiting... watching... er, no, just waiting. Now, every now and again I [I]do[/I] get a hankering for something [I]heavily[/I] thematic. Like say, an all dwarf party because the campaign is all about a dwarven mining expedition. Or maybe a party of all Paladins and Clerics, characters on some holy crusade. You get the idea. Either way I do find that when I restrict things like this the campaigns tend to be shorter, but all the same I'll run them when I get a nifty idea. Additionally, if I'm running a published campaign setting, I will run it more or less "by the book". Which is to say if the setting comes with it's own set of restrictions, I'm probably going to adhere to them. These are cases similar to my "themed" campaigns in that if I really want to run Dark Sun, I'll run it by my players, make the settings themes and restrictions clear, and if I get the thumbs up we'll move forward. Anyway, all of that said, and it's far more than I intended, I'm all for other folks running their games their way. That's the real infinite diversity I was on about to begin with. People don't need to like or agree with how I run my games, and that's cool. I've read enough posts around here by now to know there's some posters who run games I'd never sit down to, that's cool too. Anyway, I think my point was something like... whatever floats your boat man. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is infinite diversity in infinite combinations .... a terrible thing in D&D?
Top