Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is it finally time..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crazy Jerome" data-source="post: 6049565" data-attributes="member: 54877"><p>Armor with hit points, at least a simple version, is a pretty decent way to handle it <strong>IF</strong> you want: A) Some form of armor DR, <strong>AND</strong> B) A simple way to handle damage/repairs to armor. If you want both of those things, now you've got both of them wrapped up in one simple package. </p><p> </p><p>OTOH, if you only want DR or only want repair, that's not necessarily the best choice. And certainly if you don't care about either, then it's just extra, unnecessary baggage compared to the standard D&D way.</p><p> </p><p>So a simple rule that keeps the AC values of armor lower and/or even not present in return for each armor giving hit points, is a great optional rule. Keep it simple, and you don't even need to change anything else. Just specify in the rule what it implies.</p><p> </p><p>The main problem with the usual armor DR schemes (in many games, including D&D)--such as DR 4 eliminating the first 4 points of each hit--is that they imply a lot of armor reducing hits to no appreciable damage. This usually slows down the game, skews balance, doesn't do much against mega attacks, and certainly doesn't fit the typical D&D framework. Hordes of kobolds lose all threat, unless you put in a lot of supplemental rules for grappling, bypassing armor, etc., which just compounds the problems. The next choice is usually DR as a slight percentage, with the usual problem of lots of fiddly handling.</p><p> </p><p>So I've thought that if they wanted a straight DR option, a good one would be to give each piece of armor a DR that doesn't kick in until N amount of damage, and set N high enough that it doesn't apply to most average attacks. Then let the armor knock out a pretty good chunk of points, then fail to prevent any further damage. So if ringmail stops the first 10 points of damage over 12, that's really nice when you are getting pounded by ogres. It's pretty useless against 20 archers turning you into their private pin cushion. And for giants, big dragons, and the like, it turns into effectively standard DR, since they are nearly always hitting for more than 22. A similar option would be half damage up to X damage threshold, with a minimum of 1 for each hit. Tougher armors have a higher threshold, but the mechanic is always half, which is easy math.</p><p> </p><p>Of course, with the way Next is doing bounded accuracy, but letting hit points and damage values scale, you could also do some pretty neat things with letting armor knock a die or two of damage off of higher damage attacks. Plate--for any attack that does 3 or more dice of damage, drop the highest damage die rolled. For any attack that does 7 or more dice of damage, drop the two highest. And so forth. This obviously works better for groups that roll damage out in the open, as the plate guy gets to feel really good about taking those dice out before totaling the amount. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crazy Jerome, post: 6049565, member: 54877"] Armor with hit points, at least a simple version, is a pretty decent way to handle it [B]IF[/B] you want: A) Some form of armor DR, [B]AND[/B] B) A simple way to handle damage/repairs to armor. If you want both of those things, now you've got both of them wrapped up in one simple package. OTOH, if you only want DR or only want repair, that's not necessarily the best choice. And certainly if you don't care about either, then it's just extra, unnecessary baggage compared to the standard D&D way. So a simple rule that keeps the AC values of armor lower and/or even not present in return for each armor giving hit points, is a great optional rule. Keep it simple, and you don't even need to change anything else. Just specify in the rule what it implies. The main problem with the usual armor DR schemes (in many games, including D&D)--such as DR 4 eliminating the first 4 points of each hit--is that they imply a lot of armor reducing hits to no appreciable damage. This usually slows down the game, skews balance, doesn't do much against mega attacks, and certainly doesn't fit the typical D&D framework. Hordes of kobolds lose all threat, unless you put in a lot of supplemental rules for grappling, bypassing armor, etc., which just compounds the problems. The next choice is usually DR as a slight percentage, with the usual problem of lots of fiddly handling. So I've thought that if they wanted a straight DR option, a good one would be to give each piece of armor a DR that doesn't kick in until N amount of damage, and set N high enough that it doesn't apply to most average attacks. Then let the armor knock out a pretty good chunk of points, then fail to prevent any further damage. So if ringmail stops the first 10 points of damage over 12, that's really nice when you are getting pounded by ogres. It's pretty useless against 20 archers turning you into their private pin cushion. And for giants, big dragons, and the like, it turns into effectively standard DR, since they are nearly always hitting for more than 22. A similar option would be half damage up to X damage threshold, with a minimum of 1 for each hit. Tougher armors have a higher threshold, but the mechanic is always half, which is easy math. Of course, with the way Next is doing bounded accuracy, but letting hit points and damage values scale, you could also do some pretty neat things with letting armor knock a die or two of damage off of higher damage attacks. Plate--for any attack that does 3 or more dice of damage, drop the highest damage die rolled. For any attack that does 7 or more dice of damage, drop the two highest. And so forth. This obviously works better for groups that roll damage out in the open, as the plate guy gets to feel really good about taking those dice out before totaling the amount. :lol: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is it finally time..
Top