Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is it houseruling to let a torch set fire to things?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6881615" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>Yes it does. On p 87, the SRD states that objects can be harmed by physical and magical attacks in much the same way as creatures can be.</p><p></p><p>It goes out of its way to specify that certain spells <em>ignite</em> objects that are neither worn nor carried. In other words, it exempts those objects from the normal application of p 87.</p><p></p><p>You might well specify a certain class of objects as being distinctively affected if you want to carve them out from the general rules stated on p 87, which require the GM to adjudciate hit points, AC etc. That is, in fact, what I think is the most natural reading of the rules as a whole.</p><p></p><p>Your reiterating your own preferred reading doesn't change the fact that I am also reading and applying the rules as they are written. I am also curious as to what you think that point of p 87 is - at I already pointed out, a good number of the spell effects that cause damage are the fire spells.</p><p></p><p>The point is absolutely about <em>fire</em>. The rules tells us what fire damage is: it's damage caused by flames, and by the fiery breath of dragons. This is reinforced by the spell descriptions themselves talking about "thin sheets of flame", "explosions of flame" and the like. No where do the rules carry even the remotest suggestion that these are all some sort of pseudo- or magical fire that is incapable of singing the hat a goblin is wearing even as it burns the hair off the goblin's head.</p><p></p><p>Nor is there a single word stating that held/worn objects can't be damaged. That's the point. You are also extrapolating beyond what is expressly stated. You are extrapolating, from the specification of certain objects, that the general rules on p 87 are displaced. That is not stated anywhere. (There is a generic statement about "specific excluding general", but I am also applying that statement: the specific rules about ignition displace the general rules about the GM deciding on hit points, etc).</p><p></p><p>You also haven't discussed ice. Can a fireball spell melt ice? Does it matter whether or not the ice is in the possession of a creature?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6881615, member: 42582"] Yes it does. On p 87, the SRD states that objects can be harmed by physical and magical attacks in much the same way as creatures can be. It goes out of its way to specify that certain spells [I]ignite[/I] objects that are neither worn nor carried. In other words, it exempts those objects from the normal application of p 87. You might well specify a certain class of objects as being distinctively affected if you want to carve them out from the general rules stated on p 87, which require the GM to adjudciate hit points, AC etc. That is, in fact, what I think is the most natural reading of the rules as a whole. Your reiterating your own preferred reading doesn't change the fact that I am also reading and applying the rules as they are written. I am also curious as to what you think that point of p 87 is - at I already pointed out, a good number of the spell effects that cause damage are the fire spells. The point is absolutely about [I]fire[/I]. The rules tells us what fire damage is: it's damage caused by flames, and by the fiery breath of dragons. This is reinforced by the spell descriptions themselves talking about "thin sheets of flame", "explosions of flame" and the like. No where do the rules carry even the remotest suggestion that these are all some sort of pseudo- or magical fire that is incapable of singing the hat a goblin is wearing even as it burns the hair off the goblin's head. Nor is there a single word stating that held/worn objects can't be damaged. That's the point. You are also extrapolating beyond what is expressly stated. You are extrapolating, from the specification of certain objects, that the general rules on p 87 are displaced. That is not stated anywhere. (There is a generic statement about "specific excluding general", but I am also applying that statement: the specific rules about ignition displace the general rules about the GM deciding on hit points, etc). You also haven't discussed ice. Can a fireball spell melt ice? Does it matter whether or not the ice is in the possession of a creature? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is it houseruling to let a torch set fire to things?
Top