Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="doctorhook" data-source="post: 6354533" data-attributes="member: 58401">New suggestion: What if Elemental Adept also granted the caster permanent resistance or immunity to an energy type, and allow the resistant/immune type to be different from the type overcame by spells? E.g.: A fire mage with EA can overcome fire resistance and is immune to fire, while his twin brother fire mage can overcome fire resistance but decided to be immune to cold instead.Hey, didn't we XP each other earlier this thread for essentially the same post?I'd XP you again, but I don't have the Elemental Adept (XP) feat, and so I cannot for the moment overcome your XP resistance.lol He's just going to continue to repeat that it's only designed to provide a way to circumvent a single type of damage resistance. He has not demonstrated an interest in considering another possibility over the past twelve pages.You're damn straight. Take note, [MENTION=2011]KarinsDad[/MENTION], and consider Tony's point, if you're able.It's a natural suggestion! But someone did already suggest it, and the results have been mixed. There's been a debate about whether a &quot;master of (element)&quot; should be able to damage--or possibly control--creatures composed of that element. There's been no clear resolution thus far.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="doctorhook, post: 6354533, member: 58401"] New suggestion: What if Elemental Adept also granted the [i]caster[/i] permanent resistance or immunity to an energy type, and allow the resistant/immune type to be different from the type overcame by spells? E.g.: A fire mage with EA can overcome fire resistance and is immune to fire, while his twin brother fire mage can overcome fire resistance but decided to be immune to cold instead. Hey, didn't we XP each other earlier this thread for essentially the same post? I'd XP you again, but I don't have the Elemental Adept (XP) feat, and so I cannot for the moment overcome your XP resistance. lol He's just going to continue to repeat that it's only designed to provide a way to circumvent a single type of damage resistance. He has not demonstrated an interest in considering another possibility over the past twelve pages. You're damn straight. Take note, [MENTION=2011]KarinsDad[/MENTION], and consider Tony's point, if you're able. It's a natural suggestion! But someone did already suggest it, and the results have been mixed. There's been a debate about whether a "master of (element)" should be able to damage--or possibly control--creatures composed of that element. There's been no clear resolution thus far. [/QUOTE]

Verification