Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="evilbob" data-source="post: 6355509" data-attributes="member: 9789">I shockingly haven't read through the 17 pages of this thread, but two things seem important to mention:There are way fewer feats this time around.&nbsp; PHB has like 30 or something?&nbsp; It's like 4 pages (unless I really messed up looking at it).&nbsp; Hopefully they will keep it tight.As long as there are no +1 to hit feats, that's all that matters.&nbsp; Some may be really good, but only something like +1 to hit was so good that everyone had to take it.&nbsp; Every player doesn't need Alert or Tough.&nbsp; Some might really like it, but it's not 100% have-to-have like something like +1 to every attack roll you make.Which is exactly the same as +2 to a primary stat...&nbsp; So maybe we DO have required feats, and they are &quot;don't take a feat?!!?&quot;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="evilbob, post: 6355509, member: 9789"] I shockingly haven't read through the 17 pages of this thread, but two things seem important to mention: There are way fewer feats this time around. PHB has like 30 or something? It's like 4 pages (unless I really messed up looking at it). Hopefully they will keep it tight. As long as there are no +1 to hit feats, that's all that matters. Some may be really good, but only something like +1 to hit was so good that everyone had to take it. Every player doesn't need Alert or Tough. Some might really like it, but it's not 100% have-to-have like something like +1 to every attack roll you make. Which is exactly the same as +2 to a primary stat... So maybe we DO have required feats, and they are "don't take a feat?!!?" ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification