Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RFisher" data-source="post: 3349627" data-attributes="member: 3608">Besides being careful about what you say online, you also have to be careful with how you read. Assume good faith. Assume smileys were unintentionally left out. If you think something is hostile, read it again trying to see it otherwise. If that doesn't work, ignore it. It's amazing how much more friendly online communications can be when you actively choose to view it that way.At my table, we're still as open-minded as ever. Although we formed when 3e came out, we've play lots of systems. Many of them don't have the kind of support 3e does or even the comprehensiveness of the 3e core, so plenty of stuff gets created by us. (Even when playing 3e, I'd say we create a lot ourselves.)Although, we did have a player visit once who wasn't a good fit because--I hate to say he was &quot;close-minded&quot;. He just didn't want a group as eclectic as we are.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RFisher, post: 3349627, member: 3608"] Besides being careful about what you say online, you also have to be careful with how you read. Assume good faith. Assume smileys were unintentionally left out. If you think something is hostile, read it again trying to see it otherwise. If that doesn't work, ignore it. It's amazing how much more friendly online communications can be when you actively choose to view it that way. At my table, we're still as open-minded as ever. Although we formed when 3e came out, we've play lots of systems. Many of them don't have the kind of support 3e does or even the comprehensiveness of the 3e core, so plenty of stuff gets created by us. (Even when playing 3e, I'd say we create a lot ourselves.) Although, we did have a player visit once who wasn't a good fit because--I hate to say he was "close-minded". He just didn't want a group as eclectic as we are. [/QUOTE]

Verification