Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="doctorhook" data-source="post: 4227223" data-attributes="member: 58401">Don't worry, five pages of it was "The Internet & Rational Thought" vs. "Aria Silverhands". You ain't missed much. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue    :P"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" />I'm a little surprised at how evenly split the poll is. I suspect it's because the question is somewhat vague. For example, does 'new setting' mean 'totally original' or merely 'new to 4E'? Does 'now / in conjunction with 4E release' mean '6 June 2008' or 'sometime this summer'? Add the fact that we are getting the Points of Light quasi-setting on 6 June 2008, and that we will have Forgotten Realms by summer's end, and the question becomes fairly convoluted. My own answers to these subquestions led me to poll, "No, we don't need one, because we are effectively getting FR along with 4E," but I can imagine someone voting 'Yes' and sharing my opinion, and someone else voting 'No' despite completely disagreeing with me.(I'd like to say that although I believe the question posed by the poll is too subjective in its interpretation for a clear view of popular opinion, my criticism is in no way levelled at the OP, Knightshade. The question is valid, and merely its phrasing is not. It's an honest mistake.)</blockquote>