Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is It Time for PF2 "Essentials"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="meltdownpass" data-source="post: 8216863" data-attributes="member: 7029921"><p>CapnZapp's characterization paint a negative light, but I don't think the points themselves are inaccurate. It would honestly be a red flag if Paizo's development team didn't have design discussions & internal rulings on these issues.</p><p></p><p>Going back to the statement you quoted, we can examine what it means for a system to be "easier to learn." This kind of phrasing is not really meaningful. I could make a statement that the goal was for the system to be "more fun," but it should be obvious that "fun" varies from player to player. Similarly, "easier to learn" is actually carrying a lot of weight.</p><p></p><p>For someone who is logically & mathematically minded there is nothing inherently complex or overwhelming about 3E/PF1 rulesets (The complexity comes from sheer quantity of rules and edge-case interactions). You can generally ascertain how effective your character at a task is by the number of bonuses you get to certain rolls. However, if you put this type of person into a FATE game, they will probably struggle to conceptualize how aspects of their character might translate into chance of "success" or "failure."</p><p></p><p>PF2 largely removed the ability to optimize along the most-easily-communicated metric, the raw numerical axis. This by itself isn't bad, but the game retains the complexity that was ultimately the source of the problem. Players have more decision points than ever. The quantity and edge-case interactions remain. PF2 demands optimization moreso than ever, with a high default-difficulty. It's just that this optimization eschews the obvious d20 +Modifier and is in harder-to-quantify aspects such as breadth of options, action efficiency, and other avenues that require deeper understanding of the system(s) than simply maximizing a number.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="meltdownpass, post: 8216863, member: 7029921"] CapnZapp's characterization paint a negative light, but I don't think the points themselves are inaccurate. It would honestly be a red flag if Paizo's development team didn't have design discussions & internal rulings on these issues. Going back to the statement you quoted, we can examine what it means for a system to be "easier to learn." This kind of phrasing is not really meaningful. I could make a statement that the goal was for the system to be "more fun," but it should be obvious that "fun" varies from player to player. Similarly, "easier to learn" is actually carrying a lot of weight. For someone who is logically & mathematically minded there is nothing inherently complex or overwhelming about 3E/PF1 rulesets (The complexity comes from sheer quantity of rules and edge-case interactions). You can generally ascertain how effective your character at a task is by the number of bonuses you get to certain rolls. However, if you put this type of person into a FATE game, they will probably struggle to conceptualize how aspects of their character might translate into chance of "success" or "failure." PF2 largely removed the ability to optimize along the most-easily-communicated metric, the raw numerical axis. This by itself isn't bad, but the game retains the complexity that was ultimately the source of the problem. Players have more decision points than ever. The quantity and edge-case interactions remain. PF2 demands optimization moreso than ever, with a high default-difficulty. It's just that this optimization eschews the obvious d20 +Modifier and is in harder-to-quantify aspects such as breadth of options, action efficiency, and other avenues that require deeper understanding of the system(s) than simply maximizing a number. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is It Time for PF2 "Essentials"?
Top