Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is it wrong to want a fair share?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lord Pendragon" data-source="post: 1821581" data-attributes="member: 707"><p>I'm starting this thread to discuss a topic brought up in <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=104941&page=1" target="_blank">this thread</a>, posts #8, #17, and #28. I didn't want to further hijack that thread to discuss the topic, so here is a brand new thread for that purpose. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Basically, BlackMoria listed as one of his pet peeves about 3.x the way that magic items all have a value, and therefore players are often more concerned about distributing the loot evenly by gp-value, rather than by giving it to whomever most needs it.</p><p></p><p>Later this was seconded by jmucchiello, who felt that parties might TPK more often than they should, simply because they aren't giving the magic items to the person who could best use them, rather than dividing the party treasure evenly.</p><p></p><p>I disagreed with this sentiment, because in my mind most PCs are going to want a fair share of the spoils of their hard work, of the rewards that come of putting your life on the line day-in and day-out. And also, in a metagame sense, it doesn't seem right to me that one player's character get 100,000gp worth of toys, while another player's PC have 1/10th that amount. It's a game, and I want the toys as much as the next player.</p><p></p><p>Is it wrong to expect your PC to have a fair share of the loot? If you're playing a fighter and everything you find in the treasure trove is a wand, scroll or staff, time-and-again, should you be willing to take no treasure at all, because the spellcasters in the party can better use the treasure that's showing up?</p><p></p><p>It seems to me that even a Good character would want a fair share. Yes, a wizard should be able to choose the choicest spellcasting items for himself, but if <em>everything</em> you find is a wizardly item, does that mean the wizard should take everything you find, and you, the fighter, should be happy to give it to him?</p><p></p><p>Does that make sense from a character's point of view? From a player's?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lord Pendragon, post: 1821581, member: 707"] I'm starting this thread to discuss a topic brought up in [URL=http://www.enworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=104941&page=1]this thread[/URL], posts #8, #17, and #28. I didn't want to further hijack that thread to discuss the topic, so here is a brand new thread for that purpose. :) Basically, BlackMoria listed as one of his pet peeves about 3.x the way that magic items all have a value, and therefore players are often more concerned about distributing the loot evenly by gp-value, rather than by giving it to whomever most needs it. Later this was seconded by jmucchiello, who felt that parties might TPK more often than they should, simply because they aren't giving the magic items to the person who could best use them, rather than dividing the party treasure evenly. I disagreed with this sentiment, because in my mind most PCs are going to want a fair share of the spoils of their hard work, of the rewards that come of putting your life on the line day-in and day-out. And also, in a metagame sense, it doesn't seem right to me that one player's character get 100,000gp worth of toys, while another player's PC have 1/10th that amount. It's a game, and I want the toys as much as the next player. Is it wrong to expect your PC to have a fair share of the loot? If you're playing a fighter and everything you find in the treasure trove is a wand, scroll or staff, time-and-again, should you be willing to take no treasure at all, because the spellcasters in the party can better use the treasure that's showing up? It seems to me that even a Good character would want a fair share. Yes, a wizard should be able to choose the choicest spellcasting items for himself, but if [i]everything[/i] you find is a wizardly item, does that mean the wizard should take everything you find, and you, the fighter, should be happy to give it to him? Does that make sense from a character's point of view? From a player's? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is it wrong to want a fair share?
Top