Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is it wrong to want a fair share?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 1821708" data-attributes="member: 20564"><p>I think it 100% should be: How the Characters in-game have decieded what to do.</p><p></p><p>Really. The players have no loot. Unless you are in a world with adventuring charters, each adventuring group (PC & NPC) can do things different ways.</p><p></p><p>I've been in parties where:</p><p>* Everything was fair share of any encounter.</p><p>* Everythign was cumulative fair share, and people wanting a big item from an encounter often had to put a smaller item back into the pot.</p><p>* It was "give to the person who needs it the most". (This was usually the best for party survivability, but did end up with uneven distribution.)</p><p>* Give to the person who needed it most, and occasionally all magic items went back into the pot and got redivided.</p><p>* Keep a running track of cost of items, and PCs with the least treasure picked first for new treasure.</p><p>* As many of the above, but oen use items always went to whomever needed them most with no "charge".</p><p></p><p>There are a lot of things out there. Discuss it IN CHARACTER. If you character feels he's getting a bum deal, tellt he other characters. It is a role playing game after all.</p><p></p><p>Cheers,</p><p>=Blue</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue, post: 1821708, member: 20564"] I think it 100% should be: How the Characters in-game have decieded what to do. Really. The players have no loot. Unless you are in a world with adventuring charters, each adventuring group (PC & NPC) can do things different ways. I've been in parties where: * Everything was fair share of any encounter. * Everythign was cumulative fair share, and people wanting a big item from an encounter often had to put a smaller item back into the pot. * It was "give to the person who needs it the most". (This was usually the best for party survivability, but did end up with uneven distribution.) * Give to the person who needed it most, and occasionally all magic items went back into the pot and got redivided. * Keep a running track of cost of items, and PCs with the least treasure picked first for new treasure. * As many of the above, but oen use items always went to whomever needed them most with no "charge". There are a lot of things out there. Discuss it IN CHARACTER. If you character feels he's getting a bum deal, tellt he other characters. It is a role playing game after all. Cheers, =Blue [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is it wrong to want a fair share?
Top