Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is it wrong to want a fair share?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bleys" data-source="post: 1822667" data-attributes="member: 12367"><p>I'm not a big one for mincing words, so if I didn't say it, then I didn't mean it <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>What I did mean is that the gaming groups I've had the pleasure of being a part of have had people (regardless of age, since there were some huge disparities in some of them, like the one group where the youngest player was 15 and the oldest was in his late 40s) who were excellent at keeping what happened in character separate from their out of character opinions and were more than willing to work things out using the personality of the character involved.</p><p></p><p>Any of the various methods that have already been discussed make perfect sense, as well, especially if that's how the characters are played. Everyone tends to put bits and pieces of themselves into the characters they play, and one part of me that tends to spill over the most is my laid back, easy-going attitude. Because of that I'm perfectly content to go with things however the party wants to do them (unless I happen to be playing a character who is much more rigid, but I don't tend to do that too often <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />), and everyone I currently game with approaches things from the same point of view. We're all quite happy to just distribute things as people need them and not really worry the details.</p><p></p><p>Of course, the next game we start we might all decide to play characters who would rather not see things done that way, and we'll take a comletely different approach to dividing things up... but based on the last few years, the odds of that happening from a total party point of view are probably slim. I'm guessing there might be at least one of us who <strong>will</strong> play a character who is a bit more selfish, though <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bleys, post: 1822667, member: 12367"] I'm not a big one for mincing words, so if I didn't say it, then I didn't mean it :D What I did mean is that the gaming groups I've had the pleasure of being a part of have had people (regardless of age, since there were some huge disparities in some of them, like the one group where the youngest player was 15 and the oldest was in his late 40s) who were excellent at keeping what happened in character separate from their out of character opinions and were more than willing to work things out using the personality of the character involved. Any of the various methods that have already been discussed make perfect sense, as well, especially if that's how the characters are played. Everyone tends to put bits and pieces of themselves into the characters they play, and one part of me that tends to spill over the most is my laid back, easy-going attitude. Because of that I'm perfectly content to go with things however the party wants to do them (unless I happen to be playing a character who is much more rigid, but I don't tend to do that too often ;)), and everyone I currently game with approaches things from the same point of view. We're all quite happy to just distribute things as people need them and not really worry the details. Of course, the next game we start we might all decide to play characters who would rather not see things done that way, and we'll take a comletely different approach to dividing things up... but based on the last few years, the odds of that happening from a total party point of view are probably slim. I'm guessing there might be at least one of us who [b]will[/b] play a character who is a bit more selfish, though ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is it wrong to want a fair share?
Top