Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zappo" data-source="post: 2214468" data-attributes="member: 633">I don't think that even D&D morals have absolutes this simple. It depends on the circumstances.Obviously, there are only limited circumstances where killing a celestial would not be an Evil act, even if it is not unconceivable. OTOH, there are plenty of circumstances where killing a fiend would not be a Good act - fiends killing each other in the Blood War, for example.So, it is much easier for the murder of a fiend to be Neutral than the murder of a celestial. Killing a celestial out of hatred is undoubtedly Evil; killing a fiend out of hatred is arguably Neutral.This asymmetry is due to the fact that killing is inherently Evil. Fairly often in D&D, and sometimes in the real world, there are circumstances that make it Neutral or Good - but killing by itself is an Evil action. There is an offset, so to speak. As a result, it is much easier for the murder of a fiend to be Neutral than the murder of a celestial. The Good you're doing (killing a fiend) can be offset by the Evil of the killing itself, and by your motivations. But if you kill a celestial, you're throwing Evil (killing) on top of other Evil (killing a celestial). It'd take some pretty weird motivations to offset that.Whoa, I hope I'm not being too confusionary. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

Verification