Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is killing something Good an inherently Evil act?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Viktyr Gehrig" data-source="post: 2214509" data-attributes="member: 9249"><p>The killing of enemy combatants is an inherently Neutral act-- which is why the Blood War is never responsible for the redemption of fiends.</p><p></p><p> By your spoilerish example, Good Outsiders are enemies of those who would preserve the Material Plane, and are active combatants by nature of their very existence. (This is a slippery slope waiting to happen-- I would only allow this reasoning in a world where this is a demonstrable facet of the cosmology.) Killing them is a Neutral act-- though I'm stuck on whether or not Paladins can do it; do they not gain their powers by service to Good Outsiders (with Divine Rank)? However, even if Paladins would lose their status through this act, I do not think they would become Evil.</p><p></p><p> On the other hand, a Neutral Good Druid could snuff them out by the thousands and never suffer an alignment ding. Of course, by their own inclinations, they should prefer to wipe out fiends-- and if they make a habit of targetting angels when fiends are valid, viable targets, they might start suffering. I don't allow Exalted or Vile characters, since I disagree vehemently with their view of alignment, but I would allow an Exalted defender of the Material to kill Good Outsiders, as long as they had tried every non-violent means at their disposal to get them to go home and stay there.</p><p></p><p> This interpretation allows for even trickier moral dilemmas than you're offering here, though: a through-and-through Good character, a bastion of moral purity, is sworn to defend the Material Plane against intrusion by Outsiders. Whether or not to kill a Deva seems an obvious choice, here... the question is, will they ally with an ancient red dragon to do so?</p><p></p><p> An army of celestials is on the march, determined to subdue, occupy, and eventually abscond with the territory of a Good kingdom. At the same time, a cabal of necromancers and assassins has decided they have to destroy the kingdom to save it. Obviously, a Good, Materially-allied character must oppose both... but which takes priority? Which do they attack first? Will they ally temporarily with the other side? What if they <strong>can't</strong> oppose both-- thwarting one faction will guarantee the other's success. Which side do they choose?</p><p></p><p> Even better... an army of fiends has the exact same plan in regard to the kingdom of the worst tyrant your world has ever known. What are your Good characters going to do about it? What <strong>can</strong> they do about it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Viktyr Gehrig, post: 2214509, member: 9249"] The killing of enemy combatants is an inherently Neutral act-- which is why the Blood War is never responsible for the redemption of fiends. By your spoilerish example, Good Outsiders are enemies of those who would preserve the Material Plane, and are active combatants by nature of their very existence. (This is a slippery slope waiting to happen-- I would only allow this reasoning in a world where this is a demonstrable facet of the cosmology.) Killing them is a Neutral act-- though I'm stuck on whether or not Paladins can do it; do they not gain their powers by service to Good Outsiders (with Divine Rank)? However, even if Paladins would lose their status through this act, I do not think they would become Evil. On the other hand, a Neutral Good Druid could snuff them out by the thousands and never suffer an alignment ding. Of course, by their own inclinations, they should prefer to wipe out fiends-- and if they make a habit of targetting angels when fiends are valid, viable targets, they might start suffering. I don't allow Exalted or Vile characters, since I disagree vehemently with their view of alignment, but I would allow an Exalted defender of the Material to kill Good Outsiders, as long as they had tried every non-violent means at their disposal to get them to go home and stay there. This interpretation allows for even trickier moral dilemmas than you're offering here, though: a through-and-through Good character, a bastion of moral purity, is sworn to defend the Material Plane against intrusion by Outsiders. Whether or not to kill a Deva seems an obvious choice, here... the question is, will they ally with an ancient red dragon to do so? An army of celestials is on the march, determined to subdue, occupy, and eventually abscond with the territory of a Good kingdom. At the same time, a cabal of necromancers and assassins has decided they have to destroy the kingdom to save it. Obviously, a Good, Materially-allied character must oppose both... but which takes priority? Which do they attack first? Will they ally temporarily with the other side? What if they [b]can't[/b] oppose both-- thwarting one faction will guarantee the other's success. Which side do they choose? Even better... an army of fiends has the exact same plan in regard to the kingdom of the worst tyrant your world has ever known. What are your Good characters going to do about it? What [b]can[/b] they do about it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is killing something Good an inherently Evil act?
Top