Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is killing something Good an inherently Evil act?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Morrow" data-source="post: 2218244" data-attributes="member: 27012"><p>What rubs me wrong about the deva is that if the deva could be wrong, then sacrificing billions and billions of innocent lives on a gamble <em>is not Good</em>. If the outcome is unpredictable, then the deva should not be supporting a mass extermination of life. If the outcome is predictable, the Deva should be able to demonstrate how and why it will happen. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And that's why I suggested making this an issue of Lawful Good vs. Chaotic Good rather than Neutral against the Outer Planes.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, I would argue that neither the paternalism nor the tolerance are Good, per se, but elements of Law and Chaos recast as integral parts of Good by those who are LG or CG. Too much Law and you get paternalism that doesn't respect the dignity of other sentients. Too much Chaos and you may tolerate Evil until it gets powerful enough to do real damage. And that's exactly why I say that the corner alignments are unstable and serve two masters. At some point, the Lawful character needs to make choices between Order and Good and at some point, the Chaotic character needs to make choices between Liberty and Good. And each time they choose Order or Liberty over Good, that means they are less Good than a pragmatically Good Neutral Good character.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's a valid point, too. It at least raises the question of where the Chaotic Good Celestials are while this deva and others are working to slaughter billions and billions of innocent lives in order to <em>possibly</em> bring about a New Universal Order.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And that's exactly how I think this would be better cast, though Devas, as NG, should be above such issues. But even if a Lawful Good Celestial were to want to slaughter billions and billions to bring about Univeral Peace, there is still the issue that Good characters (A) protect innocent lives and (B) respect the dignity of sentient creatures. I think that playing Russian Roulette oulette with the universe could violate either.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If the deva can't be sure what happens but has no doubt, there must be some reason why the deva has no doubt. If a superior or other divine force told the deva to do what it's doing, that only ofsets the problem to a higher power. It doesn't eliminate it. Someone powerful in the Celestial realm has decided that the death of billions and billions will produce a net Good and that better be more than a guess or roll of the dice for them to remain Good.</p><p></p><p>This could be an interesting vehicle to explore issues of blind faith (on the part of the deva) if the Celestials are being deceived but that's a whole other theme. Of course an even bigger question is that with everyone in the Outer Planes arrayed againt the Prime Material Plane and wanting it to implode, what chance should the Prime Material Plane really stand against such a thing? Dragons and fey againt Angels, Devils, Devas, Demons, Archons, etc? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Which is why I think it's important to know why the deva thinks they are right.</p><p></p><p>Actually, thinking about this, if I were Evil and sure that the end of the Prime Material Plane would let me win, I'd be doing my best to convince Good people that I don't want it to end. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This should apply to all Good outsiders, I think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Morrow, post: 2218244, member: 27012"] What rubs me wrong about the deva is that if the deva could be wrong, then sacrificing billions and billions of innocent lives on a gamble [i]is not Good[/i]. If the outcome is unpredictable, then the deva should not be supporting a mass extermination of life. If the outcome is predictable, the Deva should be able to demonstrate how and why it will happen. And that's why I suggested making this an issue of Lawful Good vs. Chaotic Good rather than Neutral against the Outer Planes. Well, I would argue that neither the paternalism nor the tolerance are Good, per se, but elements of Law and Chaos recast as integral parts of Good by those who are LG or CG. Too much Law and you get paternalism that doesn't respect the dignity of other sentients. Too much Chaos and you may tolerate Evil until it gets powerful enough to do real damage. And that's exactly why I say that the corner alignments are unstable and serve two masters. At some point, the Lawful character needs to make choices between Order and Good and at some point, the Chaotic character needs to make choices between Liberty and Good. And each time they choose Order or Liberty over Good, that means they are less Good than a pragmatically Good Neutral Good character. That's a valid point, too. It at least raises the question of where the Chaotic Good Celestials are while this deva and others are working to slaughter billions and billions of innocent lives in order to [i]possibly[/i] bring about a New Universal Order. And that's exactly how I think this would be better cast, though Devas, as NG, should be above such issues. But even if a Lawful Good Celestial were to want to slaughter billions and billions to bring about Univeral Peace, there is still the issue that Good characters (A) protect innocent lives and (B) respect the dignity of sentient creatures. I think that playing Russian Roulette oulette with the universe could violate either. If the deva can't be sure what happens but has no doubt, there must be some reason why the deva has no doubt. If a superior or other divine force told the deva to do what it's doing, that only ofsets the problem to a higher power. It doesn't eliminate it. Someone powerful in the Celestial realm has decided that the death of billions and billions will produce a net Good and that better be more than a guess or roll of the dice for them to remain Good. This could be an interesting vehicle to explore issues of blind faith (on the part of the deva) if the Celestials are being deceived but that's a whole other theme. Of course an even bigger question is that with everyone in the Outer Planes arrayed againt the Prime Material Plane and wanting it to implode, what chance should the Prime Material Plane really stand against such a thing? Dragons and fey againt Angels, Devils, Devas, Demons, Archons, etc? Which is why I think it's important to know why the deva thinks they are right. Actually, thinking about this, if I were Evil and sure that the end of the Prime Material Plane would let me win, I'd be doing my best to convince Good people that I don't want it to end. :) This should apply to all Good outsiders, I think. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is killing something Good an inherently Evil act?
Top