Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 8457216" data-attributes="member: 20564">You have chimed in as an armchair quarterback.&nbsp; Actually, I would say that the majority of armchair quarterbacks have at least seen a game of football, while you don't even have that distinction.&nbsp; That is not high on the credibility scale for what you pointing out mattering.Yet you have just used a thread that is doing exactly that as a resource to support your point.Are they not doing anything useful in that thread in which case it's no support for what you are saying?Or are they doing something useful and you are just being hypocritical here?Luckily, the goal wasn't &quot;noble&quot; nor &quot;valuable&quot;.&nbsp; It was &quot;credible&quot;.&nbsp; And yes, having actually tried something to see how if it works in actual play conditions as you expect from reading it is the minimum level of playtesting to be credible.I seem to remember reading comment after comment from you asking about how they did their playtesting.&nbsp; Do you actually believe playtesting is useful, so here you are again speaking hypocritically, or in all of those did you not think playtesting was important and were just trying to win a point?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Blue, post: 8457216, member: 20564"] You have chimed in as an armchair quarterback. Actually, I would say that the majority of armchair quarterbacks have at least seen a game of football, while you don't even have that distinction. That is not high on the credibility scale for what you pointing out mattering. Yet you have just used a thread that is doing exactly that as a resource to support your point. Are they not doing anything useful in that thread in which case it's no support for what you are saying? Or are they doing something useful and you are just being hypocritical here? Luckily, the goal wasn't "noble" nor "valuable". It was "credible". And yes, having actually tried something to see how if it works in actual play conditions as you expect from reading it is the minimum level of playtesting to be credible. I seem to remember reading comment after comment from you asking about how they did their playtesting. Do you actually believe playtesting is useful, so here you are again speaking hypocritically, or in all of those did you not think playtesting was important and were just trying to win a point? [/QUOTE]

Verification