Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is "Mystic" a bad class name?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dragonhelm" data-source="post: 6660864" data-attributes="member: 3867"><p>A Dragonlance might be run by an old schooler, but not necessarily. There is a portion of the fan base who continue with the 3.5 materials in Pathfinder. Likewise, a number of us also play Dragonlance using 5e. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Back in 1e/2e, this was the case. Sovereign Press/Margaret Weis Productions took the stance that they wouldn't address the issue one way or the other and leave it up to players (per Jamie Chambers). </p><p></p><p>That being said, several of the Spheres of Mysticism in the Age of Mortals could be associated with psionics. Channeling is all about boosting physical prowess, Meditation boosts mental prowess, Mentalism is telepathy, and Sensitivity maps out fairly close with Clairsentience. Technically, Mysticism is divine, but it doesn't have to be. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think I misspoke. Didn't get much sleep last night. </p><p></p><p>So what I'm trying (poorly - lol) to say is that the 5e mystic can include all the references to the Far Realm, etc. Then Dragonlance fans can take the mystic and make it more Krynnish in nature. So kind of like how a wizard is mostly the same in all worlds, but in Dark Sun, they have to deal with preserving and defiling. </p><p></p><p>Hope that makes sense.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Right, and even Dragonlance cannot claim exclusivity on the mystic. It's a generic name, and it was used first to describe the basic D&D monk.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think I want to re-read the psionics document and see if the 5e mystic can be re-skinned to fit Dragonlance. That might be an interesting challenge.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dragonhelm, post: 6660864, member: 3867"] A Dragonlance might be run by an old schooler, but not necessarily. There is a portion of the fan base who continue with the 3.5 materials in Pathfinder. Likewise, a number of us also play Dragonlance using 5e. Back in 1e/2e, this was the case. Sovereign Press/Margaret Weis Productions took the stance that they wouldn't address the issue one way or the other and leave it up to players (per Jamie Chambers). That being said, several of the Spheres of Mysticism in the Age of Mortals could be associated with psionics. Channeling is all about boosting physical prowess, Meditation boosts mental prowess, Mentalism is telepathy, and Sensitivity maps out fairly close with Clairsentience. Technically, Mysticism is divine, but it doesn't have to be. I think I misspoke. Didn't get much sleep last night. So what I'm trying (poorly - lol) to say is that the 5e mystic can include all the references to the Far Realm, etc. Then Dragonlance fans can take the mystic and make it more Krynnish in nature. So kind of like how a wizard is mostly the same in all worlds, but in Dark Sun, they have to deal with preserving and defiling. Hope that makes sense. Right, and even Dragonlance cannot claim exclusivity on the mystic. It's a generic name, and it was used first to describe the basic D&D monk. I think I want to re-read the psionics document and see if the 5e mystic can be re-skinned to fit Dragonlance. That might be an interesting challenge. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is "Mystic" a bad class name?
Top