Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bitbrain" data-source="post: 7946373" data-attributes="member: 6863864">Yes, but only to a certain extent.  Beyond that point, I don’t mind changes to the lore, and even welcome such alterations if they appeal to my “head canon”.Further complicating matters is that how much lore I feel is necessary varies from one setting to another...DARK SUNThe lore provided in the original box set is gospel for the setting in my opinion.  I also can’t stand the idea of Rajaat.[SPOILER]I prefer the implication from the original box set that the current group of Sorcerer-Kings are just the latest in a long line of petty magical tyrants who came to power after the world went to heck.In my opinion, this makes the Dragon of Tyr special; a Godzilla/King Ghidorah-esque kaiju from the ancient world, possessing powers the current crop of Sorcerer-Kings can only dream of...[/SPOILER]EBERRONIf Keith Baker says it, then that is how it should be for Eberron, even if I dislike it.  Any changes I make at my own table that deviate from that baseline are simply because I want to see how such a change would fundamentally alter the setting.FORGOTTEN REALMSHonestly, there is literally so much lore for the FR, you could pull random statements out of thin air and they would probably be true at least somewhere on Toril...</blockquote>