Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is PAIZO becoming the next Wizards?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5094835" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p></p><p> </p><p>In all honesty - yes, I did misread that, so my apologies there. I still feel the main point you made, that "when new D&D stuff is made it is put behind the paywall and the only way to look at it is to give money to WOTC to look at what is essentially design notes and advertising" is untrue. But it seems like your point was more regarding the usability of their site in finding the free preview information more than anything else. </p><p> </p><p>The site is currently a pretty different place from a year ago. It has some issues of its own, now, of course - but articles are pretty clearly delineated whether they are free or subscriber only content. And the archive easily sorts into different categories, like 'excerpts' and 'previews'. So I believe they have addressed any concerns along those lines. </p><p> </p><p>I definitely acknowledge this is just your opinion - my issue was more with some of the claims you were making (which I didn't believe to be accurate) rather than the value judgement itself of which system you prefer. </p><p> </p><p>Namely, I will continue to argue against the claim that you can't see and play 4E with no entry cost. The character builder demo and the free downloadable starter demo give all the tools with which to do so, and the regular free previews give a lot of info about the current products being released. Claiming that you nonetheless prefer Paizo's style is fine, and a reasonable opinion - claiming that these offerings of WotC do not exist, on the other hand, is simply incorrect. That is what I am objecting to, and trying to clarify - nothing more.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5094835, member: 61155"] [I][B][/B][/I] [B][/B] In all honesty - yes, I did misread that, so my apologies there. I still feel the main point you made, that "when new D&D stuff is made it is put behind the paywall and the only way to look at it is to give money to WOTC to look at what is essentially design notes and advertising" is untrue. But it seems like your point was more regarding the usability of their site in finding the free preview information more than anything else. The site is currently a pretty different place from a year ago. It has some issues of its own, now, of course - but articles are pretty clearly delineated whether they are free or subscriber only content. And the archive easily sorts into different categories, like 'excerpts' and 'previews'. So I believe they have addressed any concerns along those lines. I definitely acknowledge this is just your opinion - my issue was more with some of the claims you were making (which I didn't believe to be accurate) rather than the value judgement itself of which system you prefer. Namely, I will continue to argue against the claim that you can't see and play 4E with no entry cost. The character builder demo and the free downloadable starter demo give all the tools with which to do so, and the regular free previews give a lot of info about the current products being released. Claiming that you nonetheless prefer Paizo's style is fine, and a reasonable opinion - claiming that these offerings of WotC do not exist, on the other hand, is simply incorrect. That is what I am objecting to, and trying to clarify - nothing more. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is PAIZO becoming the next Wizards?
Top