Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is PAIZO becoming the next Wizards?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Truth Seeker" data-source="post: 5103397" data-attributes="member: 11804"><p>1. That is a good sign on expanding their portifolio.</p><p> </p><p>2.As Wotc did not so, for whatever the reason (Hasbro had their hands all over it anyway).</p><p> </p><p>The open beta testing done by Pazio, was a sign of respect and trust to the public at large. These are same folks who can make or break your product. That is the <strong>Truth</strong>. I can say this for good reason, because folks who were involved or very aware of both beta testings of 4E and Pathfinder at those times.</p><p> </p><p>Gave me their insights, and it was like night and day...literally. Second, as a buying customer myself. I found that not giving a means to here my 'voice' heard on how a future product should function, even though it can be held as suggestions.</p><p> </p><p>Left me with the undeniable impression, that there was no trust or respect given (speaking of Wotc not doing a open beta test), as a customer.</p><p> </p><p>As mentioned as before, Pazio did...and that is all that has to be said.</p><p> </p><p>From a business end...I did understand at one point on why WOTC did that approach.</p><p> </p><p>They needed to get new blood (face it, we old ones are not around in great mass as we use to be). And I did hear comments to that effect on the release on the books, that folks who never, ever played D&D at all. Were being drawn to it, on it's 'ease of use' to run a game.</p><p> </p><p>At the same time, many and many 3.5 materials existing in mass quantity, was about to go the way of the dodo bird.</p><p> </p><p>And many folks were not happy (including me), on being 'forced' to suddenly chuck (not the tv show) that one system (on which a lot of money was spent, e.g. The entire Eberron setting book collection render almost useless). At the time of 4E release, with no conversion help, right there and then.</p><p> </p><p>As someone said here too, it like saying, "Sorry, ye must abandon that ship, row the lifeboat or swim across that crazy ocean, to get our new ship, and that is it".</p><p> </p><p>As one old 3.5 customer said to me, on the opening of 4E World game day, "I think I spent enough, serveral thousands dollars enough". and there was nothing to say, to change that person's mind.</p><p> </p><p>That was then...(and I knew what he meant...he felt abandoned).</p><p> </p><p>And yupo, yupe...you are absolutely correct, if WOtc did a open beta test, folks would have stayed. But some folks would have left too...for their own reasons or how the company treated them as customers.</p><p> </p><p>It is not a perfect world...but the first rule of business is...don't bite the hand that feeds you.</p><p> </p><p>And a lot of us, would like to keep those 10 fingers around for a long time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Truth Seeker, post: 5103397, member: 11804"] 1. That is a good sign on expanding their portifolio. 2.As Wotc did not so, for whatever the reason (Hasbro had their hands all over it anyway). The open beta testing done by Pazio, was a sign of respect and trust to the public at large. These are same folks who can make or break your product. That is the [B]Truth[/B]. I can say this for good reason, because folks who were involved or very aware of both beta testings of 4E and Pathfinder at those times. Gave me their insights, and it was like night and day...literally. Second, as a buying customer myself. I found that not giving a means to here my 'voice' heard on how a future product should function, even though it can be held as suggestions. Left me with the undeniable impression, that there was no trust or respect given (speaking of Wotc not doing a open beta test), as a customer. As mentioned as before, Pazio did...and that is all that has to be said. From a business end...I did understand at one point on why WOTC did that approach. They needed to get new blood (face it, we old ones are not around in great mass as we use to be). And I did hear comments to that effect on the release on the books, that folks who never, ever played D&D at all. Were being drawn to it, on it's 'ease of use' to run a game. At the same time, many and many 3.5 materials existing in mass quantity, was about to go the way of the dodo bird. And many folks were not happy (including me), on being 'forced' to suddenly chuck (not the tv show) that one system (on which a lot of money was spent, e.g. The entire Eberron setting book collection render almost useless). At the time of 4E release, with no conversion help, right there and then. As someone said here too, it like saying, "Sorry, ye must abandon that ship, row the lifeboat or swim across that crazy ocean, to get our new ship, and that is it". As one old 3.5 customer said to me, on the opening of 4E World game day, "I think I spent enough, serveral thousands dollars enough". and there was nothing to say, to change that person's mind. That was then...(and I knew what he meant...he felt abandoned). And yupo, yupe...you are absolutely correct, if WOtc did a open beta test, folks would have stayed. But some folks would have left too...for their own reasons or how the company treated them as customers. It is not a perfect world...but the first rule of business is...don't bite the hand that feeds you. And a lot of us, would like to keep those 10 fingers around for a long time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is PAIZO becoming the next Wizards?
Top