Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TheAuldGrump" data-source="post: 5723137" data-attributes="member: 6957">Because Palladium is widely considered to be badly run, badly edited, badly balanced, under financed, and under the control of a micromanaging megalomaniac maybe? Trust me, if there were rolling eye emoticons on this board, I would be using them.I actually meant my post to lampshade #3, but your reply made me reconsider it under a serious light. I actually was planning to footnote that reference, but....An insult is no less an insult when pointing to a convenient, but irrelevant, article. 'You are ugly and your mama dresses you funny. I am not trolling, here, look at this article about giraffes.'For that matter there can be trolling that is inoffensive, but when you begin with an offensive premise that you are defending as not a troll before the first reply it seems pretty obvious that it is a deliberately offensive premise. That you posted it in the Pathfinder discussion area lends credence to that assumption. If someone had (or has) done so in the 4e area I would expect posters to treat the subject as an attempt at trolling.So, I am treating it in the same manner that I would an attempt at trolling, under the assumption that it is a duck.The Auld Grump</blockquote>