Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Walking Dad" data-source="post: 5723214" data-attributes="member: 59043">Crothian, maybe you are right and I'm just to much on EN World <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />I see to much 4e fans being critic to nearly move Wizards does (I only say offline character builder) and always criticizing the system ("expertise feats are a bad math fix") that I thought this to be normal.On the ATT forums, there is also critic on M&M regarding the skill cost, the worth of the Presence ability and other stuff.So what I described is maybe the normality and the above the exception.Answering you post1) The critics on NWoD were for changing to much. Same with 4e. But Pathfinder (and Rifts) are the only cases I know were they were criticized for not changing enough.2) This was also the point that got me thinking.3) GURPS world backgrounds/fluff are often used with other systems? I honestly thought it was the other way around. They have officially adapted other 'world' to their system the OWoD line, for example).4) As I said, both the D&D 4 and M&M fanbase are much more critical on their 'chosen' system.5) Palladium got a real hype during their TMNT book phase. And Pathfinder was number one on a recent sell list.But you are right, this is a very bad category to compare games/companies.</blockquote>

Verification