Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Paizo the new Palladium? (It isn't!)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gamerprinter" data-source="post: 5723477" data-attributes="member: 50895"><p>I could call myself a critic on some things, but I mostly do not agree that full-attack routine is bad, nor that spellcasters have too many options. I'm quite comfortable with giving spellcasters options, because they are so physically weak compared to martial classes (more easily killable than fighters). Until you get to higher levels. I have no problems until 18th + levels, but then I don't care for games at that level or higher. So with the levels I play now, the game is quite balanced in my opinion. My martial characters don't need more options. Being this is my opinion, and can call myself a critic, then I have to say, that I do not mutually agree with other critics, as you suggest we agree...</p><p> </p><p>Though the thread isn't about 4e, the point regarding 3.5 rules needing updating (which is doesn't/didn't) is only in regards to 4e. WotC along with some fans think that the 3.5 rules needed updating, for those 4e must be included in this thread. For the rest of us, yeah, 4e, doesn't belong, becausing updating 3.5 doesn't belong.</p><p> </p><p>But there are all kinds of critics (look at the critics against 4e) - some critics agree, many do not. I don't think there is a consensus among critics. Your point 1 suggests there is. You can't make a statement that all critics agree on anything, let alone this point. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Yeah, everybody prefers the game system they currently play the majority of - whether that's 4e, PF or any other game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gamerprinter, post: 5723477, member: 50895"] I could call myself a critic on some things, but I mostly do not agree that full-attack routine is bad, nor that spellcasters have too many options. I'm quite comfortable with giving spellcasters options, because they are so physically weak compared to martial classes (more easily killable than fighters). Until you get to higher levels. I have no problems until 18th + levels, but then I don't care for games at that level or higher. So with the levels I play now, the game is quite balanced in my opinion. My martial characters don't need more options. Being this is my opinion, and can call myself a critic, then I have to say, that I do not mutually agree with other critics, as you suggest we agree... Though the thread isn't about 4e, the point regarding 3.5 rules needing updating (which is doesn't/didn't) is only in regards to 4e. WotC along with some fans think that the 3.5 rules needed updating, for those 4e must be included in this thread. For the rest of us, yeah, 4e, doesn't belong, becausing updating 3.5 doesn't belong. But there are all kinds of critics (look at the critics against 4e) - some critics agree, many do not. I don't think there is a consensus among critics. Your point 1 suggests there is. You can't make a statement that all critics agree on anything, let alone this point. Yeah, everybody prefers the game system they currently play the majority of - whether that's 4e, PF or any other game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Paizo the new Palladium? (It isn't!)
Top