Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Paizo the new Palladium? (It isn't!)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheAuldGrump" data-source="post: 5724352" data-attributes="member: 6957"><p>It was a joke, but apparently not a funny one. Not intended as an insult. I apologize if it was taken as such. I was aiming at absurdism, referring back to a comment that I made in my initial reply. Sorry.</p><p></p><p> Or perhaps not so frequently insult them. It does seem that any time you mention PFRPG you are either insulting or dismissive. Your choice of terms is contextual. Whether that is intentional or not... I think that it would be less unkind to say that it is deliberate.</p><p></p><p>If every time you mention a game it is either dismissive or connected to a jibe, then it is natural to assume a dislike.</p><p></p><p>Since there are other games that you mention without taking potshots at as you ride by, it is safe to say that there <em>are</em> games that you like.</p><p></p><p>But, again, it is all right to not like any particular game.</p><p></p><p>Repeating:</p><p>But frequently in other posts.</p><p></p><p>And, given those other posts, yes, this <em>is</em> about 4e. Context is everything. Greater as well as internal.</p><p></p><p>If I were to try writing a post praising the good qualities of 4e my public statements about what I describe as shortcomings in the system should, and will, be taken into account.*</p><p></p><p>At least in part because of your wording, and perhaps your intent.</p><p></p><p>Feel free to restart the thread with different wording. If the intent was <em>not</em> to insult Paizo then perhaps you can make it more clear next time.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps some of it may have been unfamiliarity with a common perception of Palladium. By the sound of it you actually like their games, and may not have noticed the negative impact that the company itself has on your comparison.</p><p></p><p>It is possible that the <em>both</em> of us fell victim to the reactions described in the article that you directed attention towards.</p><p></p><p>But, mostly, I think that it was the way you chose to defend rather than clarify your position that made me set my spear. For my part, I am likely overly didactic in my critique of both your original post and the defenses that you have mounted therefor.</p><p></p><p>Clarification would have been a better stance than defense.</p><p></p><p>The Auld Grump</p><p></p><p>* There are actually a few things that I consider good points about 4e, in particular preparation time. Not a huge matter for me, I enjoy the prep. But I am willing to accept that I am in the minority in that regard.</p><p></p><p>*EDIT* Removed some redundant passages.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheAuldGrump, post: 5724352, member: 6957"] It was a joke, but apparently not a funny one. Not intended as an insult. I apologize if it was taken as such. I was aiming at absurdism, referring back to a comment that I made in my initial reply. Sorry. Or perhaps not so frequently insult them. It does seem that any time you mention PFRPG you are either insulting or dismissive. Your choice of terms is contextual. Whether that is intentional or not... I think that it would be less unkind to say that it is deliberate. If every time you mention a game it is either dismissive or connected to a jibe, then it is natural to assume a dislike. Since there are other games that you mention without taking potshots at as you ride by, it is safe to say that there [i]are[/i] games that you like. But, again, it is all right to not like any particular game. Repeating: But frequently in other posts. And, given those other posts, yes, this [i]is[/i] about 4e. Context is everything. Greater as well as internal. If I were to try writing a post praising the good qualities of 4e my public statements about what I describe as shortcomings in the system should, and will, be taken into account.* At least in part because of your wording, and perhaps your intent. Feel free to restart the thread with different wording. If the intent was [i]not[/i] to insult Paizo then perhaps you can make it more clear next time. Perhaps some of it may have been unfamiliarity with a common perception of Palladium. By the sound of it you actually like their games, and may not have noticed the negative impact that the company itself has on your comparison. It is possible that the [i]both[/i] of us fell victim to the reactions described in the article that you directed attention towards. But, mostly, I think that it was the way you chose to defend rather than clarify your position that made me set my spear. For my part, I am likely overly didactic in my critique of both your original post and the defenses that you have mounted therefor. Clarification would have been a better stance than defense. The Auld Grump * There are actually a few things that I consider good points about 4e, in particular preparation time. Not a huge matter for me, I enjoy the prep. But I am willing to accept that I am in the minority in that regard. *EDIT* Removed some redundant passages. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Paizo the new Palladium? (It isn't!)
Top