Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Paizo the new Palladium? (It isn't!)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gamerprinter" data-source="post: 5730674" data-attributes="member: 50895"><p>I don't think one can be critical of any game system and not expect some extremist to respond in a less than helpful way. There's always going to be haters in any discussion on a public forum. You can't get away from that (I wouldn't let yourself worry about that, just concentrate on the reasonable answers). You can talk about sports, politics, religion - any subject and somebody will give a hate response at some point, it can't be avoided. But you needn't dwell on the haters.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>While I certainly mentioned 4e in one of my posts, 4e is an update to the D&D rules, so I still think it belongs in the discussion, along with Trailblazer, GURPS, M&M, Pathfinder and many other rule sets, as each are an update to the D&D rules in some measure.</p><p></p><p>You shouldn't discount out of hand any responses that mention 4e, as it is indeed part of the discussion, or at least should be.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>You have a right to your opinion, which could be very different from others, and there's nothing wrong with that.</p><p> </p><p>However, you did use the word 'worshippers' regarding PF fans, which is an insulting word. Just because someone is a fan of a given game system, does not make them worshippers. (I can honestly say, I worship nothing - not even a deity.) I also prefer PF over 4e, but I don't hate 4e - in fact I don't hate any game. I see 'game hate' as an unreasonable position to be in for anyone, so it would be best that you leave those kinds of responders out of the conversation, as they offer nothing helpful.</p><p> </p><p>Looking over these posts in this thread, it seems most are being reasonable (some aren't, but those few needn't poison the discussion). </p><p> </p><p>As an aside, I do have Trailblazer which I purchased before purchasing PF, however, having read both sets of rules, while Trailblazer offers some interesting points, PF is closer to the rules update that I prefer.</p><p> </p><p>What are you expecting or hoping to resolve from this discussion, WalkingDad?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gamerprinter, post: 5730674, member: 50895"] I don't think one can be critical of any game system and not expect some extremist to respond in a less than helpful way. There's always going to be haters in any discussion on a public forum. You can't get away from that (I wouldn't let yourself worry about that, just concentrate on the reasonable answers). You can talk about sports, politics, religion - any subject and somebody will give a hate response at some point, it can't be avoided. But you needn't dwell on the haters. While I certainly mentioned 4e in one of my posts, 4e is an update to the D&D rules, so I still think it belongs in the discussion, along with Trailblazer, GURPS, M&M, Pathfinder and many other rule sets, as each are an update to the D&D rules in some measure. You shouldn't discount out of hand any responses that mention 4e, as it is indeed part of the discussion, or at least should be. You have a right to your opinion, which could be very different from others, and there's nothing wrong with that. However, you did use the word 'worshippers' regarding PF fans, which is an insulting word. Just because someone is a fan of a given game system, does not make them worshippers. (I can honestly say, I worship nothing - not even a deity.) I also prefer PF over 4e, but I don't hate 4e - in fact I don't hate any game. I see 'game hate' as an unreasonable position to be in for anyone, so it would be best that you leave those kinds of responders out of the conversation, as they offer nothing helpful. Looking over these posts in this thread, it seems most are being reasonable (some aren't, but those few needn't poison the discussion). As an aside, I do have Trailblazer which I purchased before purchasing PF, however, having read both sets of rules, while Trailblazer offers some interesting points, PF is closer to the rules update that I prefer. What are you expecting or hoping to resolve from this discussion, WalkingDad? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Paizo the new Palladium? (It isn't!)
Top