Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Point Buy Balanced?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9834952" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>This <em>is</em> accounting for the variance.</p><p></p><p>When you roll <em>six sets of</em> 4d6k3, there will be a range for what "the highest stat of that set of six" is. That range will be narrower than the range for just <em>any</em> result of 4d6k3, because you're specifically selecting for the <em>largest</em> one. The peak will be further right and narrower than the peak of just any general roll would be. Likewise, the peak for the single lowest stat will be narrower and further left.</p><p></p><p>Here's the chart, if you want the variance component added in.</p><p><img src="https://anydice.com/articles/4d6-drop-lowest/6_abilities.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="500x250" style="" /></p><p>The chart only explicitly lists the average values. The SDs, in order 1, 2, etc., are 1.43, 1.44, 1.46, 1.53, 1.66, and 1.95.</p><p></p><p>This chart, by comparison, shows the difference between 3d6 and 4d6k3.</p><p><img src="https://anydice.com/articles/4d6-drop-lowest/4d6dl_vs_3d6.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="500x250" style="" /></p><p>The SD for 4d6k3 is 2.85--significantly greater than even the distribution for the worst stat, and almost <em>double</em> that of the highest stat.</p><p></p><p></p><p>What definition would that be? I'm genuinely curious.</p><p></p><p></p><p>My problem is the "of some sort" here. I believe "dump stat" is a fairly strong term. Not like ironclad unequivocal, but for it to be a "dump stat" it has to be more than "I ended up having to choose <em>something</em> for the 7 I rolled to go in".</p><p></p><p>To me, "dump stat" means that you actively picked something to pull points out of, knowing the cost would be minimal. Merely having some lowest score is insufficient for that. Rolled stats are not totally immune to having a "dump stat", but they have at least a little bit of protection against that simply because you <em>can't</em> pull points out of anything to put into anything else. At least not with current rules. There were, I'm given to understand, ways to massage the old strict rolling method, where you could pull points out of stat X to put into stat Y, but at a 2-for-1 rate.</p><p></p><p>So...yeah it's the "of some sort" that I'm having issues with here. I see the term as being pretty clear in meaning, requiring some degree of <em>minmaxing</em> to qualify, even if it's just a little bit. Regardless of method, but especially if you roll stats, something is going to have to be the lowest number (possibly multiple somethings). Like if I roll and get {18, 15, 14, 13, 12, 10}, is it really warranted to say that if I put the 10 in Dex that Dex is my "dump stat"? Or Cha or whatever. It just feels...off to refer to something you absolutely <em>have</em> to assign at some point as being a "dump" stat solely because every ordered set of numbers necessarily has a least element (though there may be multiple instances of that least element). The {4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3} array, or its twin, the {18, 18, 18, 18, 18, 17} array, illustrate what I mean by this--can we honestly call something a "dump stat" if you put a <em><strong>17</strong></em> into it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9834952, member: 6790260"] This [I]is[/I] accounting for the variance. When you roll [I]six sets of[/I] 4d6k3, there will be a range for what "the highest stat of that set of six" is. That range will be narrower than the range for just [I]any[/I] result of 4d6k3, because you're specifically selecting for the [I]largest[/I] one. The peak will be further right and narrower than the peak of just any general roll would be. Likewise, the peak for the single lowest stat will be narrower and further left. Here's the chart, if you want the variance component added in. [IMG size="500x250"]https://anydice.com/articles/4d6-drop-lowest/6_abilities.png[/IMG] The chart only explicitly lists the average values. The SDs, in order 1, 2, etc., are 1.43, 1.44, 1.46, 1.53, 1.66, and 1.95. This chart, by comparison, shows the difference between 3d6 and 4d6k3. [IMG size="500x250"]https://anydice.com/articles/4d6-drop-lowest/4d6dl_vs_3d6.png[/IMG] The SD for 4d6k3 is 2.85--significantly greater than even the distribution for the worst stat, and almost [I]double[/I] that of the highest stat. What definition would that be? I'm genuinely curious. My problem is the "of some sort" here. I believe "dump stat" is a fairly strong term. Not like ironclad unequivocal, but for it to be a "dump stat" it has to be more than "I ended up having to choose [I]something[/I] for the 7 I rolled to go in". To me, "dump stat" means that you actively picked something to pull points out of, knowing the cost would be minimal. Merely having some lowest score is insufficient for that. Rolled stats are not totally immune to having a "dump stat", but they have at least a little bit of protection against that simply because you [I]can't[/I] pull points out of anything to put into anything else. At least not with current rules. There were, I'm given to understand, ways to massage the old strict rolling method, where you could pull points out of stat X to put into stat Y, but at a 2-for-1 rate. So...yeah it's the "of some sort" that I'm having issues with here. I see the term as being pretty clear in meaning, requiring some degree of [I]minmaxing[/I] to qualify, even if it's just a little bit. Regardless of method, but especially if you roll stats, something is going to have to be the lowest number (possibly multiple somethings). Like if I roll and get {18, 15, 14, 13, 12, 10}, is it really warranted to say that if I put the 10 in Dex that Dex is my "dump stat"? Or Cha or whatever. It just feels...off to refer to something you absolutely [I]have[/I] to assign at some point as being a "dump" stat solely because every ordered set of numbers necessarily has a least element (though there may be multiple instances of that least element). The {4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3} array, or its twin, the {18, 18, 18, 18, 18, 17} array, illustrate what I mean by this--can we honestly call something a "dump stat" if you put a [I][B]17[/B][/I] into it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is Point Buy Balanced?
Top